What's that saying? "Cold hands, warm heart?"

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

In response to "will Trump roll it back?"

According to Daniel, “most of those people would look at it and say, ‘Okay, we may not be excited about it, but why roll it back? Because most of what it tries to do is pretty nonpartisan or bipartisan. And if you roll it back, then you’re leaving yourself open to, ‘so why did you get rid of it?”‘

Because logic and Trumpian Republicans mix even less well than oil and water. They also tend to have severe cases of "not invented here" syndrome. They'll make a big deal about rolling "the incompetent piece of crap" back, change three words and the title, then claim how much better their version is.

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Rapid7‘s Adam Barnett says January marks the fourth consecutive month where Microsoft has published zero-day vulnerabilities on Patch Tuesday without evaluating any of them as critical severity at time of publication. Today also saw the publication of nine critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities.

Man, I hope this doesn't mean they're trying to avoid looking bad by not publicizing severe issues. This is not an area where politics should prevail - it'll only be far worse in the end.

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 3 points 12 hours ago

What things did he support Biden doing? If it's continuing to support Israel's genocidal war, then that's not a plus.

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 15 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Just get a VPN - I've heard good things about Prot... wait... scratch that. 🙄

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 8 points 13 hours ago

Better that than writing out "DemocRATS," I guess.

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

That's in large part because the market has been engineered to force that on a lot of people. There's exceedingly few alternatives that aren't evil, and those few that exist are comparatively quite expensive to choose - especially at a time when much of the public doesn't get paid enough anymore to be able to afford that choice.

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, "abuses" like DEI and other equality, sustainability, etc initiatives.

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 9 points 13 hours ago

i.e. Take all our worries away by leaving us with nothing to worry about.

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 13 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I think they were asking about the actions against big tech starting under Trump. My memory ain't what it used to be (& it was never very good), but even if something was started under Trump there have been various actions taken against big tech going at least as far back as the Internet Explorer near-monopoly days - so it's not exactly like they did anything new, special, or unprecedented.

EDIT: Can some kind soul take pity on me and explain why I'm getting downvoted, instead of just a hit & run? What did I get wrong?

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 3 points 14 hours ago

"Deeper ties," or simply more cannon fodder for the front lines?

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Thanks - I've subbed & will check it out.

149
58
232

Sorry these guys have to put off their retirement, but thank goodness they're willing to.

-23

IMHO, the only "hypocrisy" is with the conservative-owned press holding Biden to standards LONG since tossed aside for Trump. The people have made it clear they only respect a government who fights dirty, and WAY effing past time they get what they asked for. In the scheme of things, this is positively mundane - but they'll try to attack anything that Dems do that they'd gleefully make excuses for Trump doing since that pisses off Dems. I congratulate Biden for finally saying "fuck it," and doing the same thing they would do.

51

It blows my mind that there are no legal blocks in place to prevent this (yeah, I know it's because this shit was so unthinkable that nobody prepared for it). This yahoo is on a mission to destroy EVERYTHING America was supposed to stand for. SOMETHING has to be done to stop this shit!

97

Republicans: the party of freedom, my farking ass.

99
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Frankly, I hope Elon wins this one. His handling of Twitter demonstrates his incompetence, and his inability to keep his mouth shut will be helpful in preparing to fight whatever BS they're up to next. The other guy might be too smart and sneaky considering his involvement in the fake elector scheme.

30
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

Google's "Voice Access" is decent for controlling the device through verbal commands, but you have to be looking at the screen to get results - it won't read anything back to you.

Google's "TalkBack" will read things on screen to you, but you have to interact with the screen physically (never mind the significant change in how interactions work - which I understand the need for - but it's still a serious mental PITA to switch between the two interaction methodologies frequently).

Is there no way to just interact with it entirely verbally? A (very) simple example of what I'm looking for:

  1. "What are the current Google News headlines?"
  2. Starts reading each one aloud, along with the names of the sources.
  3. "Read the article about Trump caught making out with Elon from AP News."
  4. Proceeds to load the article & read it aloud.

(Yeah, I know there are podcasts for this - it's meant to illustrate the basic idea of completely verbal interaction with the device, not be an actual problem I'm looking for someone to provide a solution to.)

It just seems to me that we should be able to do this by now - especially with all the AI blow-up over the past couple of years. Can anybody point me to a usable solution to accomplish this?

TIA.

EDIT: I thought of a better example (I think), because it occurred to me that the above one could (sort of) be done with a Google Home speaker. I'm looking to be able to interact with Android apps verbally wherever possible, so my better example is "What are the latest posts made to the 'No Stupid Questions' community on Lemmy?" So far as I know, Google Home is not able to do such a thing. I'd like to tell Android to open my Lemmy client and start reading post headlines until it hit one I wanted to have it open & read to me.

I'm basically looking to use apps verbally to fill in gaps that Google Home/Assistant don't cover.

EDIT 2: Here's an even better, more universally applicable description of what I'm after - copied from a response I gave to another comment:

Imagine someone doing some relatively mindless menial job such as working an assembly line, janitorial work, chauffer - something where your mind is relatively unoccupied, but you're not free to look at and/or touch your device (whether it be due to practicality, or job rules). While doing that job, I want to be able to have the device read and interact with something of interest to me at that moment (ADHD is a fickle mistress), rather than just relying on podcasts with predefined content. Kind of like having someone next to me doing all the interfacing between me and the device.

EDIT 3: I added a comment with some news on options that may come close enough to doing the job which I've come across since posting.

251
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

I've often assumed Harris didn't want to insult her boss by going against him, because I got the impression she was planning to give Netanyahu what for once she took over - especially with him escalating things further and further. Did anyone else get that vibe, or was it just wishful thinking on my part?

171
201

People are calling for violence against FEMA on TikTok and X, new reports say.

I seriously don't understand why these people aren't immediately tracked down and arrested for terroristic threats. This BS is way beyond any reasonable "free speech" limit.

view more: next ›

SanctimoniousApe

joined 5 months ago