[-] SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From a technical standpoint, there is no real difference, it comes down to how the instance owner feels it's best to run the server.

Ultimately, instances (or at least the ones most people want to join) want to keep rulebreakers, trolls and spam out. There are two main ways of doing this:

  • Proactively: By attempting to prevent bad actors from signing up in the first place.
  • Reactively: Allow everyone to sign up, and ban bad actors when they misbehave.

Of course, there is a lot of debate as to which of these methods are better (beehaw, for example, fundamentally doesn't think a reactive approach can work at all), which causes tension between some instances.

This tension can rise to a point where one instance "defederates" from another, meaning they stop talking to each other and you can't interact with one if you have an account with the other.

[-] SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

https://sub.rehab/ Is also useful, if you want to look up by subreddit.

[-] SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I will say, as I've grown older and more jaded, I've been finding the GPL more and more appealing...

Edit: Oh wow, why did a year old post show up at the top of "Hot", sorry about bumping.

[-] SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Actually started playing this for the first time a few days ago! Such a good game, very charming art style, and the mechanics and ideas are amazing. Certainly a game to go into blind, and just enjoy the experience.

I also did not realise it was secretly a soulslike, but it never really felt that punishing (as someone who never got past the first real boss of Elden Ring).

[-] SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think so; I used "block" as a shorthand for defederate.

Agreed on doing it manually though, there only seems to be a handful of instances that are problematic, so we probably don't need to use the python script.

41
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works to c/agora@sh.itjust.works

See the tool here: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/95652

And some discussion of the issue here: https://lemm.ee/post/177673

This tool produces a list of instances which have a very high number of users compared to the number of comments and posts. These instances are assumed to have high number of bot accounts on them.

Some other instances have started blocking them, should sh.itjust.works follow suit?

Of course, this need not be permanent, and will be reversed when those instances resolve the issue.

For reference, this is a list of instances suspected of being botted by the tool's default settings: https://overseer.dbzer0.com/api/v1/instances?activity_suspicion=20&domains=true

Ayes and nays please!

[-] SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Out of interest, since Chromium is open source, is there anything stopping Opera, Edge, Brave, etc. just mantaining support for the old manifest? Like, I'm not sure why this is such a big deal for anything other than Chrome and Chromium.

[-] SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

A flower garden.

Not like, evil or anything. Guy just really likes gardening.

[-] SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Nay. You shouldn't be able to buy your way to influencing policy.

If there really is a concern with bot accounts or duplicate accounts, then those should be tackled via different ways. Also, what is with the assumption that "assholes" both don't have money and also shouldn't be allowed to vote?

6

Registrations should require a valid email address and temporary/disposable (e.g. temp-mail.org ) email services should be rejected.

Note this should not be implemented as a whitelist; "obscure" email services such as Protonmail, Tutanota and personal email servers should be allowed.

Pros:

  • Cuts down on the number of trolls attempting to register, reducing load on mods and admins.
  • Improves our standing with other instances.
  • Ensures users have the ability to reset their password.

Cons:

  • Has privacy concerns - people may not want to associate their email address with everything.
  • Users may not (and perhaps should not have to) trust the admins of this instance with their email.
  • May not be supported well by Lemmy, and/or require a blacklist that needs updating.

Aye and nay in the comments, please.

[-] SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Aye, but with the caveat that people outside the instance should be allowed/encouraged to make comments if they feel it has value.

[-] SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Fun fact: If you google those codes you find out that they are "real" codes, but they don't actually activate Windows. I think they are something that are used as placeholders in the upgrade from Windows 8 to 10 or something, but don't know the specifics.

ChatGPT actually can't create new "words", just regurgitate words that it's seen somewhere before!

[-] SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I've been perpetually working on various gamedev projects for many years now. I'll finish one eventually, I promise!

Most recent one is a retro style JRPG. With a flexable skill system where each character has two classes and can pick some number of skills from them. Also has a number of equippable "quick time" events a-la Mario RPGs. Using ggez for it, which is a decent engine. Although for future projects I may pick something more feature complete like bevy.

Currently thinking about starting a new project to make a Sonic-like game, because if Sega isn't going to do it, I may as well give it a go. :P

[-] SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Just a quick idea I had, and this may have been suggested before and maybe be untenable. But... Could communities be made invite/approval only as well as instances?

For example, on beehaw they want to ensure that everyone posting to their communities have been vetted in some way. So could have all the communities not allow posts by who haven't agreed to beehaw's "content policy"? Either by naturally having an account on beehaw, or by submitting a request to a moderator of the community.

Would allow people on other instances to see and follow those posts (but not post themselves, unless they go through beehaw's approval process), and beehaw people to go and interact with other communities on other instances.

view more: next ›

SavvyWolf

joined 1 year ago