What is your source for this?
Hillary undermined his whole presidency.
Yes, the fact that Russia ran a coordinated disinformation campaign that favored Trump does undermine his legitimacy a bit, but let's not miss the forest for the trees. The fact that Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 and lost the election entirely in 2020 is more significant.
Al Gore tried to use law to win election.
61,000 ballots were not counted by mistake. Gore used the law to try and have them counted and the conservative supreme court interfered for political reasons. Gore was in the right.
Conspiracy theory
The amount of evidence supporting this theory rivals the theory of gravity.
A bot would surely have better grammar.
Hilary with making false russian claim
In what way do claims of Russian interference - which has some truth to it btw - directly result in the overturning of an election?
Gore with all the counting shenanigans
Insane to present an example of an election being manipulated in Bush's favor as an attempt by Gore to overturn an election. How are we supposed to have a discussion when we clearly live in different realities?
How were they going to overturn an election by occupying a building?
The attack on the Capitol was part of a wider plan orchestrated by Trump and his backers. The fake electors, the call to Georgia's secretary of state, the baseless accusations of voter fraud... All of these combine to paint a pretty clear picture. Hell, the crowd at the Capitol called to hang Mike Pence because he refused to count the fake Certificates of Ascertainment.
I'm only responding for the benefit of others since I know you're just going to deny all of this or try to claim Democrats did the same or worse, but I really do hope you overcome your delusions someday.
Legal warfare, I dont like it either, but the losers do this a lot.
Show me one time Democrats have attempted to stop the certification of an election by force. You can't just pretend this happens as a standard matter of course.
what was May 29th?
May 29th was a riot and not an insurrection because it had nothing to do with trying to overturn an election. Are you getting it yet?
Are you suggesting that an attempt to halt the certification of a presidential election endorsed and encouraged by the sitting president in the hopes of avoiding abdicating power is equivalent to a protest over police brutality?
Is that what you think happened on J6? Failure is not the same as giving up.
I was just intuiting the answer based on watching a bunch of educational videos, I am not qualified to do the math on this lol.
No explosion, just radiation and heat. Everyone nearby is dead, just not instantly.
Any good leftist candidate would mobilize opposition voters, that is unavoidable. It's no reason to not run a good candidate.
This is highly contested and no credible evidence has been produced for these claims. Israeli propagandists have been hard at work conjuring up lies wholesale and it's shameful to repeat them without verification.
I think it's the same issue as conservatives suddenly realizing their favorite band or movie/tv franchise is gasp woke!
They passively consume media without analyzing it beyond the surface level, then are personally offended that they were "baited" into consuming what they see as woke propaganda.
Then they also notice a trend of more overt progressive elements in media because of an increase in surface-level corporate pandering, and they blame "wokeness" for bad storytelling without realizing people who are actually woke hate the shallow pandering too.