Scoopta

I must just be really lucky then? I've been running Linux exclusively for about a decade, including on my laptops and while my most recent laptop is from System76 every laptop I had before this one and all the HW in my desktop was purchased without considering Linux compatibility because I literally haven't had hardware compatibility issues in years. I thought those issues were from Linux of the past and my own experience agrees with that. Weird.

I must just be really lucky then? I've been running Linux exclusively for about a decade, including on my laptops and while my most recent laptop is from System76 every laptop I had before this one and all the HW in my desktop was purchased without considering Linux compatibility because I literally haven't had hardware compatibility issues in years. I thought those issues were from Linux of the past and my own experience agrees with that. Weird.

It's wild to me that even MS and the WSL play nicely with mesa but not Nvidia, God forbid Nvidia play nicely.

Correct, and stateless translation is called SIIT which is the point of my comment. NAT64 traditionally refers to NAPT. Just like how NAT66 traditionally refers to NAPT and stateless 6to6 translation is usually referred to as NPTv6

I'm not saying it should be ignored. "Stateless NAT64" is technically called SIIT and is a mode of operation Jool supports too. I am mostly complaining about terminology here, not usefulness. Tayga is not a NAT64 and has different use cases.

IMO tayga shouldn't even be branded as a NAT64. It can be used for SIIT or as a CLAT in a 464XLAT setup but crucially those are both different from true NAT64. The only FOSS NAT64 I've found is jool

This might be the first time I've ever approved of the use of DRM

Unrelated to the question but I don't believe webm(matroska) is based on RIFF, webp is but that's separate.

Maybe it's just me but it feels like calling it anything other than Linux is just an UHM, ACKTUALLY. And that's saying something because I'm one of the most pedantic people I know.

What has the US government actively done to harm FOSS? Last I knew they contributed to and maintained several high profile FOSS projects. The NSA maintains Ghidra and other US agencies fund and contribute to tor.

Also while I do agree that the NSA is more likely to approach US based organizations and US citizens to include back doors willingly it doesn't stop them from attempting to covertly get back doors in place. Additionally let's not pretend like the US 3 letter agencies don't have agreements in place with their European counter parts to do cross border shenanigans. It's known that they do.

Genuine curiosity, why power shell?

I'm not sure I see the urgency? Plenty of organizations in the US love free software, OSU wouldn't be providing hosting if they didn't. Additionally most of Europe isn't exactly a bastion of privacy. There are certainly exceptions, notably Switzerland but the majority isn't that much better if you ask me. I'm also not entirely sure how privacy is all that relevant to where websites and source code is hosted, these projects aren't storing personal information. I think the important thing is that these projects are hosted and that funding is found. Where they're hosted is mostly irrelevant.