Scoopta

Tl;Dr they all failed because they're init daemons and not entire system management daemons. Article gave a nice description of the different choices but I gave up reading after runit because the reason for failure always boiled down to

It's only an init daemon

Honestly people are making a big deal out of this but I don't get it, the time for the outrage was when both AMD (2023) and Nvidia (2022) introduced frame generation into their respective upscalers. It was always gonna be downhill from there.

You make a good point, yes the government needs surveillance reform but we also need better data broker laws

Wonder if this will also allow swap on btrfs raid

Technically that segment is not a com file. They are MZ exe files. com files have no metadata or header.

There are actually 3 exe variants, MZ, NE, and the modern PE

The interpreter is then executed in unprotected real mode for full privileges.

Good thing I'm running sudo from real mode so it can elevate me to real mode

I still use them exclusively lol

resizepart 1 128 Instead of 128GiB ...bad day

Tbh I wouldn't trust a script that repartitions my storage even if it wasn't written by AI.

Honestly to play devil's advocate, California's law almost is the lesser of 2 evils, if software can ask the OS for age verification then maybe companies will stop rolling out actually invasive verification, and if the OS verification is handled by the sysadmin then it satisfies both sides, people that want to have age verification, and people that think it should be left in the hands of parents as a parenting role. Me personally? I'd rather we have no verification at all but that isn't the path the world is moving down.

Are the https requests being sent to an IP address assigned to node B? If so you either need an nginx reverse proxy on node B or NAT with port forwarding.

This is a really interesting idea. As a fellow developer I like the sentiment, what licenses exist that are anti kyc?