7
submitted 8 months ago by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world

Clear close-up footage. What do you all think?

17
submitted 8 months ago by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world
16
submitted 8 months ago by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world
22
submitted 8 months ago by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world
8
submitted 8 months ago by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world
7
submitted 8 months ago by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world
8
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world

CONFIRMED- A classified briefing on UFO / UAPs scheduled for tomorrow from the intel community to lawmakers has been POSTPONED.

The briefing was meant to address some of David Grusch’s claims to congress under oath. No more votes for the rest of the week, so many lawmakers are flying back home tonight.


Edit:

Ask a Pol

NEW: Hearing the UAP Caucus is looking to reschedule their second Grusch SCIF briefing on Dec. 7th.

Fluid. More updates to come…

11
submitted 9 months ago by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world
8
submitted 9 months ago by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world

Congressman Tim Burchett (TN-02) sits down with Ryan Graves, the first active-duty pilot to come forward to Congress about UAPs. Graves founded Americans for Safe Aerospace and hosts the popular "Merged" podcast.

7
submitted 9 months ago by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world

Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, head of the U.S. Government's UAP office, recently made the following comment about David Grusch’s claims regarding recovered ET tech:

"We are investigating each and every one of [Grusch’s claims & leads]. ... There are some bits of information that are turning out to be things and events that really happened."

Transcript here.

Additional Tweet by Christopher Mellon.

As I’ve said before, David Grusch is genuine and sincere. Moreover, I’ve heard the same claim from a number of other serious and well-placed officials. I’m confident that Congress will find more reasons to take these profound claims seriously as they continue their investigation.

25
submitted 9 months ago by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world

Wow! GO GO UFO! 🛸 An amendment passed today to get David Grusch into a SCIF with those he testified to in Congress (under oath) at the public UFO hearing... to spill the beans of the details he couldn't reveal in the open hearing. We're talking UFO programs and names, UFO holding locations, list of "hostile" and "non-hostile" witnesses... and about the non-human "biologics" (bodies).

It's a meeting that's been blocked - but now it looks like it's gonna happen. it will undoubtedly lead to some subpoenas - which I think is good - for those who need that extra layer of protection to spill the beans and come clean about America's UFO exploitation and reverse engineering programs. I have some individuals in mind 😉 @RepEricBurlison

GO GO UFO!!!

26
submitted 9 months ago by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world
[-] SignullGone@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

It's interesting that David Grusch expects the government to make a formal statement regarding UAP in 2024, and that year could be potentially wild in a good way.

I'm curious as to what type of statement he expects to be made.

[-] SignullGone@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

I thought it was pretty odd that they didn't account for wind speed. Personally, I'm not sure how we (NASA included) can make a definite conclusion, as we don't have access to all of the sensor data. AARO apparently does have access to the sensor data and has determined this case is still unresolved.

[-] SignullGone@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

I'm not familiar with what earthquake lights look like, however, these look more like orbs of light rather than the images that pop up in google when searching "earthquake light".

[-] SignullGone@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Credit to reddit user theyarehere47.


These are just copies of documents sent by UFO researcher Lee Graham, who was trying to validate their authenticity.

The fact that they are on file at the Reagan library does not mean they are authentic, they are there because they were documents received during Reagan's presidency.

The document the quoted regarding "Project Aquarius" is known as "The Carter Briefing Notes" or "The Carter Document" and came out back in the late 1980's.

Then-UFOlogist Bill Moore (co-author of the first book on Roswell) had been in contact with a number of intelligence sources and one day they sent him on crazy trip straight out of an espionage movie. He had to engage in all sorts of cloak and dagger tradecraft, like flying across the country, waiting for instructions by pay phones, etc--- finally, he ended up in a motel in upstate New York.

There was a knock on the door, and when Moore opened it, a man was standing there holding an envelope. The man told Moore he had precisely 19 minutes to do what he wanted with the documents.

So Moore clicked on the light at the desk, and began photographing the papers. He also read the text into a tape recorder, in case the photos didn't come out. Precisely 19 minutes later, the man collected the papers, put them back in the envelope, and left without saying a word.

Sometime later, Moore published the document as part of his investigation into the original MJ-12 documents. Although he never came to a final conclusion, he suspected it probably was a mix of disinformation and truth.

[-] SignullGone@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Seems pretty clear for a night video. No lights that would indicate it as another aircraft.

[-] SignullGone@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

It seems to me that an increasing number of commercial pilots, not just military ones, are coming forward. Rightfully so, they present UAP as a flight safety risk.

Even if the idea of UAP representing non-human intelligence is laughable to some, I think we owe it to our pilots to provide them with answers.

[-] SignullGone@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

Some key points (credit to reddit user showmeufos):

  • They found 700 spherules using their magnetic sled, and thus far have analyzed 57 of the 700 spherules.
  • They conducted mass-spectrometry on 47 of the 57 analyzed spherules thus far. Of those 47, 5 spherules reveal "a distinct extra-solar abundance pattern."
  • Since IM1’s spherules melted off the surface of the object, the enhanced "Be" abundance might represent a flag of cosmic-ray spallation on IM1’s surface along a extended interstellar journey through the Milky-Way galaxy. This constitutes a fourth indicator of an interstellar origin to IM1, in addition to its high speed, its heavy element composition and its iron isotope ratios.
  • The enhanced abundances of heavy elements may explain the high material strength inferred for IM1 based on the high ram-pressure it was able to sustain before disintegrating. The high material strength inferred for IM1 can potentially be tested experimentally by assembling a material mix based on the “BeLaU" composition, with proper compensation for lost volatile elements.
  • The "extra-solar" spherules have abundances of the elements Be, La and U, (abbreviated "BeLaU") by up to 3 orders of magnitude more than materials found within the solar-system do.
  • "The 'BeLaU' abundance pattern is not found in control regions outside of IM1's path and does not match commonly manufactured alloys or natural meteorites in the solar system."
  • This evidence points towards an association of "BeLaU"-type spherules with IM1, supporting its interstellar origin independently of the high velocity and unusual material strength implied from the CNEOS data.
  • They suggest that the "BeLaU" abundance pattern could have originated from a highly differentiated magma ocean of a planet with an iron core outside the solar system or from more exotic sources.
[-] SignullGone@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

I strongly advocate for skepticism in this community; it's essential. However, I urge everyone to remain civil. Our Code of Conduct is provided in the rules for reference.

Additionally, I believe that if one feels the need to resort to ad hominem attacks, it's likely because they lack a coherent argument to substantiate their stance.

[-] SignullGone@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Either the U.S. government has mounted an extraordinary, decades-long coverup of UFO retrieval and reverse-engineering activities, or elements of the defense and intelligence establishment are engaging in a staggeringly brazen psychological disinformation campaign.

This sentiment echoes my own thoughts. In my opinion, either of these scenarios should be the most significant news right now.

[-] SignullGone@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Personally, I believe this is the right approach. They should pursue the money and corruption. If there's more to this story, as Mr. Grusch alleges, they'll uncover it in the process.

[-] SignullGone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

He is not there to provide a synopsis of the NewsNation interview, but rather to answer the specific questions posed by Congress. He stated multiple times during the hearing that what he is allowed to publicly say is all available in the NewsNation interview.

[-] SignullGone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

If you are to believe what has been stated by David Grusch and others, The United States is not the only country. I recommend the UAP Guide on the sidebar as a pretty good baseline to get up to speed, if you are curious. I linked you to the section called "Global phenomena".

I hope I was able to answer your question.

view more: next ›

SignullGone

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
uap