[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 27 points 1 week ago
  1. Change the UI and mess with plugins.
  2. More bloat in the install package that should be optional plugins.
[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 32 points 2 weeks ago

They are doubling down on that mistake it would seem. Article says most of their losses last month were from their foundry division. I realize I'm just a random person on the ground, but shit like this really has me shaking my head. For a company like Intel foundry is absolutely essential to their business. If they can't build the chips, build them better, faster, smaller, they can't compete. It's like if Airbus said they are firing everybody in their airplane division to focus on important things. What the hell, the airplane is the important thing. Same thing with Intel.

Seems like a great time to buy stock in AMD.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 26 points 2 months ago

That's when an operating system is supposed to do. They make mistakes when they make it worse. Usually, the operating system starts worse and eventually gets tolerable. That happened with Windows 10. Initial versions were far inferior to Windows 7, but now it's at a pretty good state. Windows 11 is a pile of fucking garbage. There is no compelling feature in Windows 11 that would make anyone want to upgrade. There are compelling reasons not to upgrade, such as advertising, menus that require more clicks to get the same shit done, forced use of Microsoft account, etc.

There's also the fact that Windows 11 refuses to run unless you have a handful of specific hardware in your computer, such as TPM 2.0, and a relatively modern processor. There is no technical reason for this requirement, it was discovered very early on that if you override the check it will install and run just fine. But Microsoft seems determined to get people to throw away their older but still perfectly good computers.

That is a very big part of why Windows 10 is still so popular. If you have a computer from six or seven years ago that you've upgraded once or twice, it's probably still perfectly good. No reason to throw it away for Windows 11 when you can keep on trucking with Windows 10.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Of course they can't. It's gotten so bad they ship their TVs with antivirus on them. The only reason anyone uses their Android phones is they have the best hardware, most of their add-on software is just useless gimmicks people turn off. Tizen on watches was never going to work. Apple has a large enough ecosystem to attract app developers. Google has a large enough ecosystem to attract app developers. Samsung does not. Smartest thing they could do now is shut down their remaining software development. Ship the TVs with vanilla Google OS like LG, strip the bloatware off their phones, etc. They would lose face but their products would become way better.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 26 points 3 months ago

I agree. Even at $120 each. 120 times tens of millions is serious fucking cash. We need to have a couple of big companies go bankrupt over this shit. Then maybe they will start taking it seriously. Perhaps at that point maintaining personal data on people will be seen as a liability rather than an asset. And that's what we really need.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 27 points 3 months ago

Just disable TPM in your BIOS if you have that option. Win 11 needs modern TPM so it won't upgrade you if you don't have one.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 32 points 8 months ago

Hopefully this judge doesn't come down with a case of severe depression that causes him to shoot himself twice in the back of the head and then drive his car off a cliff, as usually seems to happen to those who threaten a certain political family...

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 28 points 8 months ago

I think it should become customary that if a politician advocates for a certain punishment for a crime, and then commits that particular crime, that they receive the punishment they advocated for (within the bounds of current law of course). He wants a 10-year prison sentence for destroying a statue, he should get a 10-year prison sentence for destroying the statue.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 26 points 8 months ago

I think the hardest part of turning your life around, no matter what your age is, is habit. Breaking habits is really really hard. And habits can be mental as well as physical, how you think about things, how you approach things, how you feel about things, a lot of that is habit too. It's hard to think about and even harder to put in the effort to change. But unless you're one of those magic people that just always had good habits, it's worth it.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 24 points 9 months ago

Good. If you try to break into someone else's shit, you should reasonably expect to get shot at.

It is worrying to me that the supposedly highest trained security guards in the world couldn't actually hit their target. I would expect better in terms of both accuracy and fire discipline.

It is also worrying that if a citizen like you or me tried to defend ourselves and our property in the same way in much of these nation including DC, we would go to jail. I think we deserve the same rights as 'important people'.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 27 points 9 months ago

Welcome to Clock 2.0, the new time and reminder experience from Microsoft! Powered by Bing AI and Microsoft OneDrive.

  • Sync your time zones, alarms, and reminders to all your devices via Microsoft OneDrive
  • Get suggested wake-up times powered by Bing AI and your calendar!
  • Use of Clock is governed by the Microsoft Cloud Connected Experiences Privacy Policy (click here to view).
  • Click I Agree to start your use of Microsoft Clock!

and for all this, your alarm reminders become yet another datapoint for personalized ads, your phone alarm to wake you up then plays at full blast through the living room computer and wakes everybody else up, and you agreed to a 750kb privacy policy that displays in a 2"x3" window with 500 pages to scroll through.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 24 points 9 months ago

Or are you saying that it was her parents' responsibility to be monitoring her technology use 24/7?

Dunno about parent commenter, but that is exactly what I am saying. The parent is responsible for the minor child's safety. That would include not giving her unmonitored unrestricted internet access until she reaches an age when she can safely use it. That is literally what parental controls are there for.

To make an analogy- The kid here was playing in the street and got hit by a drunk driver. The solution to that isn't to put Ford out of business for making the truck, or to put fences on every sidewalk. The solution is throw the drunk driver in jail and remind parents not to let their kids play in the street.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

SirEDCaLot

joined 9 months ago