Not to mention a lot of people can't afford (or otherwise can't justify) the expense of a new car in general. We're just starting to see some of the very early Leafs drop below $10,000, so there is hope, but the range/dollar needs to improve a bit to make sense for most people.
I have a vague memory of seeing bagged Island Farms milk in one grocery store on Vancouver Island but it would've been over 20 years ago. I only ever knew one family that bought it, and they were complete weirdos across the board.
I grew up in a small community on Vancouver Island, my parents still live in the same house. When I was growing up there used to be dozens of kids on our street/neighbourhood. Over the last few years the only people who could afford to move in were people near or past retirement. Now there's only 1 out of 30 houses with kids, and I don't think a single other person is young enough to have kids if they wanted (maybe someone from my generation who couldn't afford to move out). It's really killed the vibe of the neighbourhood.
Yeah, as much as I think this is a stupid idea I don't think it's as bad as Walmart trying to implement Costco style receipt checkers. The less human involvement the more I'm likely to screw up and miss scanning something. Definitely by accident obviously, I wouldn't want to steal from a faceless corporation that only reluctantly employs anyone.
The grocery cartel.
I recently went to a mall where the baby change room was separate from the washrooms, except you had to walk through the women's washroom to get to it. And the actual location meant there was no reason they couldn't have had a separate door directly out into the hall.
They might have different laws in Ontario but in BC that's also the way to do it.
If they're on the bike they're considered a vehicle and have to cross the road in the same way a car would*.
If they're walking the bike they're treated as a pedestrian and must walk across the crosswalk
*( There are exceptions, such as multi use trails, but they are either clearly marked to both the road and trail users or they have a stop sign for cyclists)
There's one store (I think it's Walmart but I'm not 100% sure) that will put the price per unit on everything, but in one product category you might have price/100g, price per individual item (1 cookie), price per sub-packaging (sleeve of crackers in a box), or it'll count the entire product as 1 of 1 units.
Did you even read your own link? Besides sales dropping 4% (which it says was expected due to the rate hikes) every other stat they listed was up year-over-year or month-over-month.
Price growth has remained solid in Quebec and the East Coast, followed by British Columbia and the Prairies. Ontario is now a mixed bag, still with some of the bigger increases but also some of the bigger declines.
That sounds to me like the only area where prices aren't still growing are parts of Ontario and maybe the territories.
That's good to hear, but I think it's disingenuous to say that EVs are the cheaper option when talking about people who aren't within reach of even the cheapest new cars. Until we start seeing used decent condition EVs under $10k they're still out of reach to a lot of people. It sucks because these are the same people who would benefit most from the lower operating costs.
Someone buying an investment property doesn't increase the amount of housing available. Sure, it's one more rental available, but it's also one less home available to be purchased by someone planning to live in it. I won't claim to be any kind of expert, but it's pretty obvious that it having a middle man extracting profit increases housing costs overall.
The type of investors that do increase housing are developers. In the tax model above, the developers can apply to have the tax reduced to 5% which seems to make it much more lucrative than buying individual houses to rent as is.
Someone
joined 11 months ago
Somehow I got lucky and the paywall disappeared on refresh. My takeaway was that we should make the capital gains on investment real estate (I'm assuming anything other than principal residence) be taxed at a 100% inclusion rate. Part of the reason is that most of the people seeing these gains are at the age where they're starting to require a higher share of government spending while earning less from employment, so it's reasonable for them to pay closer to their share of taxes.