[-] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 7 months ago

Yeah I boycott all TERFs and encourage my friends to do the same. Just like the chicken place, and the pillow guy, and anyone else who thinks making other people's lives hell is a valid political stance. Don't gove those people money if you don't have to, please. Just pirate it

[-] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 7 months ago

As soon as my facility went from not-for-profit to privately owned they cut our staffing by around 15% and started aggressively increasing intakes.

Shocker, quality of care dropped.

[-] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 77 points 8 months ago

Absolutely not. Women are people the same way men are. We ask stupid questions that we didn't think through purely out of curiosity, and then realize how rude it was on the drive home just like you do.

She may be, but if she is, that's a godawful opener. I have 0 rizz but something like 'I like your shoes' or w/e is never hard to pull.

[-] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 9 months ago

Damn that was a weird twist ending

[-] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 10 months ago
  1. Have them type it a second time phonetically, and let them test it
  2. If single-player? Don't. If multiplayer? Yeah... that'd be a nightmare lmao
1

Got me through some dark times, and great for crying in the shower along to!

[-] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 11 months ago

Working in the medical field, I hear it a decent amount in appropriate context and it's often still a little creepy.

[-] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 11 months ago

I feel like pf2e has just enough rules to empower the players to the level I like

The more DM fiat a game has, the more trust I need from my players for things to go smoothly.

That's not a bad thing, necessarily, but for me structure is usually good as long as it doesn't raise the skill floor too high.

Once I've got trust built and feel a bit more experimental, I like Dungeon World or even Universalis

[-] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 11 months ago

From what I read (yes I actually read the walls of text they post) the two weren't exclusive. There were violent protestors during that time, and the protests in the square were minor, nonviolent, and opposed by dispersion via an announcement rather than tanks.

I'm not sure if I believe all that, but it's better to know what they're actually saying, imo

[-] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 1 year ago

Woah, I had no idea social credit was made up. That kinda blows my mind.

[-] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 year ago

I like you guys lots ❤️

I hope you don't get disappeared by our Sharky State. Your memes can border on rancid but mostly I'm into it 😎

[-] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm an anarchist myself, but if you try to approach their argument logically I think you'll have a better chance of understanding why people might come to different conclusions than you.

If the bourgeois were left to their own devices, it stands to reason they'd be back on their shit as soon as they saw a chance. In that light, an oppression of the formerly oppressive minority for the benefit of the majority (literally everyone else) might seem like a necessity.

Based on what theory I've read, that and protections from external capitalist pressures are the entire reason for implementing a 'dictatorship of the proletariat'.

I'm not saying you're wrong here, just that some empathy might help some leftist unity along into helping more people see things our way.

[-] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 70 points 1 year ago

I mean I'll admit my bias as a politically-minded leftist, but I like them. I don't agree with all their takes, but it feels like a positive way to poke some holes in the echo chamber a bit.

1
2
This trope always gets me (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/sapphicart@lemmy.blahaj.zone
view more: next ›

Star

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF