I didn't see any audio or video in the article. He could very well have said "9/11" and the authors left out the forward slash by mistake or thinking it unnecessary.
TankieTanuki
if equating Zionism and Judaism is anti-Semitic, then calling the Zionist project "Jewish supremacist" is the same.
I don't think that follows. Equating Judaism with "Jewish supremacy" is what would be anti-Semitic.
*Unprovoked aggressions
The sentence also makes complete sense by both interpretations, because nine-eleven was an emergency.
All nine-elevens are nine-one-ones, but not all nine-one-ones are nine-elevens.
Curious, isn't it? I even hear people say "call nine eleven" aloud when speaking about the emergency number. The original pronunciation has been erased.
If I had schizophrenia I would definitely be weaving something about that being the real goal of 9/11 from the start.
I remember people wondering on that day whether the "terrorists" chose the date on purpose.
Is everyone in this comment section doing a bit, or did that event make our brains incapable of ever again that sequence of digits as "nine one one" (the phone number)?
I'm genuinely curious, because, I admit, I immediately see "nine eleven" until I read more closely, so I assume others must be making the same error.
Edit: I guess this question should have been directed to @PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net and @spectre@hexbear.net
Damn, must be nice.
Politicians are always saying they'll extend recess but they never deliver.
We're fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them here.
OpSec is when I can no longer read old effortposts by my favorite posters.
When you post on Reddit, you're posting with Hitler.