Can I say something controversial?

Celebrity gossip has exactly the same appeal as Shipping and fan-theories, just for people who are more interested in reality than some TV-show.

So just let people enjoy things.

Yes, this is transphobia hurting a cis women, but because so many misidentify her as trans officials correctly fear it will have consequences for woman and LGBTQ+ athletes.

• "He was ten times the man you're"
• "I'm greater than he's"
• "Who do you think you're"

I actually got called and Elon Defender for pointing out that this is most likely fake, I'm glad most people here at least came to that same conclusion.

Still,

I have never seen a sign saying I shouldn't cut spaghetti, shouldn't order pizza Hawaii, must split the potato with a fork, must have the knife in my right hand, or that the different cutlery for side dishes are mandatory.

Might be different in a high class restaurant, but whatever.

The only things signs in restaurants tell me is either "we only serve real meat, pussies can beat it" and "we did indeed pass the last inspection, here's the grossest looking cartoon implying we shouldn't have".

Even his good opinions need to overhype AI...

Anyway, we all saw that Tom Scott video, we know it's a bad idea.

"klimafreundlicher E-Fuel" ist ein Märchen.

Tut mir Leid, da nicht technologieoffen zu sein, aber der einzige Grund, weshalb darüber überhaupt geredet wird, ist damit der Verbrennermotor weiterhin verkauft wird. Das Ziel ist nicht von E10 heute auf E100 in 10 Jahren zu kommen, das Ziel ist noch 10 Jahre E10 zu verkaufen, und dann rummaulen das der Sprung nach E100 viel zu plötzlich kommt, und 50% Ethanol ja wohl ausreicht.

The left-leaning parties disappointed me with their posters this election. There was 1 that said "Set a mark against fascists" and showed an anti-afd protest, and another with a similar message.

I know they are the nazi party, I want to know what YOU stand for. I'll have to guess political scientist found out nobody really changes their mind from a poster, so the only thing they do is remind people of their party that they need to go out and vote.

If that's the case, the poster may be better than I give it credit for. Still, doesn't seem to have worked.

For the 1915 intended reader, the punchline is that Everett is ill-tempered with an extremely short fuse.

For a 2024 reader, it's a Tuesday.

I am all for mentioning his conviction in the 1st sentence, but the crowd saying it should go into the 2nd sentence make some good points.

Barely anyone gets to have "convicted felon" in their lead sentence. Firstly, it is poor style unless the person is only known because they did a crime, secondly, convicted felon can mean a lot of thing and should be specified. "Convicted of falsifying business records" is just so much more specific, and can later be added with "and election interference".

In any case, while the discussion is ongoing it has been included in a 2nd sentence, and the editors supporting to move it to first sentence seem to be the majority. ~~If only more of them would read the whole discussion, instead of just saying "Support due to being established fact".~~

• Get everyone to use Linux
• Buy Linux
• Enshittify Linux with Ads until its almost as bad as Windows
• Profit

...what do you mean, "open-source"?

A sad day when following international law is considered exceptional.