Vegan_Joe

If I understand it correctly, Microsoft sells discounted keys to organizations as part of their Volume Licensing for businesses.

Some places on the internet take advantage of that, and sell the keys individually.

I love to hate on all of the glaring deficiencies of the US just as much as anyone, but it may be unwarranted in this instance.

The US is not the top of the list, but far from the bottom, being 15th out of 58.. That amazes me, considering how bruised and battered the education system is.

The American education system is underfunded, and politicized in every negative way. Then we get posts like this that attempt to bash it further.

The fact that we are in good company in regards to reading levels only speaks to the dedication of most educators. They certainly aren't in it for the money...

They are currently reading at a higher level than 30 years ago.. Though they are still a couple points behind pre-pandemic levels, it is still close enough that it leads me to believe these teachers are apparently new to teaching and a bit alarmist.

I teach 7th and 8th graders, and proficiencies certainly fluctuate from year to year. That is even more exaggerated with the pandemic "virtual learning" year.

Each year we have been able to pinpoint exactly what content they missed, because at this age group the content they missed was foundational.

That said, though technology has affected how we all relate to information, students in my classroom are able to approach novel challenges in creative and unique ways, and it is always exciting to see them grow and develop new skillsets from the unique vantage their lifetime has provided them.

Sure, it can be jarring and frustrating when we approach a lesson or topic that presumes a skill set they are missing, but part of being an educator is providing students with opportunities to grow those skills.

Educators deserve to be able to vent to each other, but I think it is irresponsible to post things like this publicly, because it gives the wrong impression and feels very negative.

A side topic, but this pulls to mind the gay rights movement in my lifetime. It always felt like an extension to the civil Rights movement. Which is all the more concerning with the current rhetoric around gender and sexuality.

This really hit home to me when I was a teenager and a colleague at work started talking about the famous demonstrations she attended. She was probably 60, but looked and acted 40, which made it especially jarring.

A similar thing happened when I visited the Martin Luther King Jr national museum in Atlanta. They have pictures and items scattered throughout, and as we were browsing, an older man was nearby excitedly talking about each of the people in the exhibit on a personal level. As it turned out, he was friends with all of them. It made it feel bizarre, because we walked into a history museum, and left with it feeling too recent to be history.

The final shock for me was when my mom casually mentioned that her elementary School was segregated! My siblings and I were shaken. She acted like it was something we should have already known, and maybe we should have already pieced that together when analyzing the time frames. The problem was that the Civil Rights movements in my mind were compartmentalized in the History section.

I honestly like the small, eclectic vibe better.

I don't know what the number is, but I'll arbitrarily say, anywhere under a quarter million is perfect.

I know the federation model provides a strength against the cascading list negatives that plague popular platforms, but I don't doubt that with a large enough user base, exploits would certainly seep in, particularly with ease of AI bot manipulation and astroturfing.

It reminds me of the Linux saying "security through obscurity".

You joke, but ruling with an iron fist in an academic sub is preferable. Requiring a bit of academic integrity in responses to questions is what makes a history sub valid. For instance, requiring all responses to provide sources should be a bare minimum.

The old place required "answers that are in-depth, comprehensive, well-sourced (academic), and written by knowledgeable contributors, prohibiting bigotry, speculation, links as answers, and current event discussions", with a core principle to "provide high-quality historical information, not quick facts, focusing on expert-vetted responses that adhere to historical methodology and avoid modern political debates, even if framed around history."

Being extremely judicious in the act of moderating is one of the aspects that allows academic subs to flourish.

I am currently finishing the Ellsworth translation of The Three Musketeers and it is phenomenal.

I believe I read the Buss translation of The Count of Monte Cristo years ago. For a book so long, it only felt like a couple hundred pages.

Both have kept me captivated, to the point that I searched lemmy to see if any similar books had been discussed. The Musketeers certainly feels more lighthearted and less consequential, but still difficult to put down.

If you have any suggestions for a next read, I'd love to hear suggestions!

Same bitrate, file size, and metadata (with my tags still included), along naming schemes and occasional misspellings.

Many of the songs I ripped and shared via Napster in the late 1900's continued to appear on legitimate platforms years later.

Holy smokes! I see his online persona so often that I forgot he had a pen name!

"No man ever steps in the same river twice". Everything flows.

Similarly, impermanence is a fundamental aspect of reality, and fighting it ultimately results in feeling things are unsatisfactory in some way.