[-] ViridianNott@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m not the person you replied to but I can comment to this effect. (Sorry for the wall of text - a lot of context to give about the American two-party system).

America has always found itself entrenched in a two party system. Periods that resemble now (very tight competition between the two parties) are very common in American history, but you do get occasional periods where a single party will be dominant for a long stretch. This says just as much about the unsuccessful party as it does the successful one: one is able to represent a large segment of American society, and the other is not. In this situation, the unsuccessful party will always rebrand to increase it’s relevancy (the alternative is that a party collapses and a new one forms, but that has not happened for >170 years). As an example, the Democratic Party (today includes Obama and Biden) once was the first choice for racist Southerners who were butthurt about the civil war. The Republican Party (today includes Trump) was led by the likes of Lincoln and was extremely progressive in racial issues for the time.

All this to say that the Republican Party doesn’t have to change in name or branding or even leadership to eliminate Trumpism and provide a platform for moderates. History tells us that, instead of a successful 3rd party rising up and replacing the Republicans, we will simply see a relatively short period (maybe 12-20 years) of Democrat victories and then the Republicans will be forced to adopt a more reasonable platform.

To an extent, this is already happening. In 2016, Republican Party leaders planned to adopt a platform that was more progressive on racial and women’s issues - they saw it as a lesson learned from their failures in the Obama era. Those same officials were blindsided by Trump’s popularity and had to pivot the opposite direction to meet the mood of the country. Despite Trump’s success though, his platform was never designed or planned as a long term strategy for winning elections and gaining support. Trump’s supporters are overwhelmingly old compared with his opponents, and thus are literally being replaced.

This should illustrate the extent of the republican party’s failure to adapt: they have won ONE presidential election popular vote since 1992. One. Out of eight that have occurred.

People like OP are an important part of this natural process of party realignment. OP rightly should be represented by a major party, but the modern Republican Party is failing to represent him. His is not a rare opinion in American political discourse; there are millions of people who would vote for more moderate conservatives if they had the option. One impact of this is that more far people are registering as “independent” voters than in previous years.

The end result of this, of course, is that the Republican Party is likely to change to represent people like OP over time. If people like OP begin to feel disillusioned with the Republican Party and it’s platform to the extent that they don’t vote, this process will only speed up. OP can do nothing better to quench the rise of far right trumpism than to be a political orphan for a while. That’s exactly what we’re encouraging by pointing out that his party hates him.

TL;DR

This dichotomy is not new in American politics and OP will actually do more to change the GOP from the outside than from the inside.

[-] ViridianNott@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Never had that or met anybody who has. You should go to a doctor bro

[-] ViridianNott@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

GOP

Trump-Lovers not welcome

Dude, take a look at trump’s poll numbers for registered republicans. You are the one who is not welcome in the modern GOP, and you should stop kidding yourself about that fact.

[-] ViridianNott@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

This mfer doesn’t know the difference between fusion power and fission power smfh

[-] ViridianNott@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You have the palate of a child

[-] ViridianNott@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Okay so I agree that it needs to be peer reviewed and independently verified before we can trust it. But how exactly does the preprint look rushed?

[-] ViridianNott@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

I’m a biologist working on increasing the accessibility of pharmaceuticals and it’s totally my dream job!

There are days that I’m not exactly happy to be at work, but I can’t imagine how selfish and lazy I would feel if I gave it all up pursue nothing other than my own comfort.

[-] ViridianNott@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Meaningless as long as they continue to use the site/app and give him ad revenue.

[-] ViridianNott@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Set my phone face-down on my leg for a moment while watching porn… the picture I was looking at was sent to 3 of my Snapchat contacts. I was able to delete 2 of the 3 before they were opened, but the guy who saw it was my ROOMMATE at the time and was IN THE NEXT ROOM.

Hard to live down.

[-] ViridianNott@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

not a fucking chance

178
Caught a bird! (lemmy.world)
[-] ViridianNott@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Look man I’m as upset about the price of homes as anyone, but let’s not pretend that 2009 was a peachy time to participate in the economy.

Home prices were historically low because of a housing crash that caused the worst global recession since before WWII

1
1
[-] ViridianNott@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Try not pooping for 3 days. This tricks your body into no longer being constipated

4
view more: next ›

ViridianNott

joined 1 year ago