Zaktor

joined 2 years ago
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

A late exit poll by the Ipsos institute released three hours after polls closed showed Trzaskowski with an estimated 31.1 percent of the votes and Nawrocki with 29.1 percent. That suggested that the runoff on June 1 could be very tight. Official results are expected on Monday or Tuesday.

Not on its own it doesn't. It could indicate a blowout if the rest of the vote was for candidates more closely aligned with one or the other. Adam Schiff and Steve Garvey were separated by 0.1% in the CA jungle primary and no one thought "well, that means the head-to-head election might be close".

 

Many of those who were loudest in denouncing cancel culture then are now curiously silent in the face of Donald Trump’s assaults on free speech.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

You're the one who thought "he's probably not saying murder" was defending him.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You think the kinder interpretation is that he's not calling for the assassination of Trump?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago (4 children)

No they aren't. There's a very big difference between abandoning or discarding something and murder. And the hospitality meaning includes kicking someone out, which applies perfectly fine.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For anyone else who made the same assumption, it's seashells, not shell casings.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah, going forward "graduated from Colombia" will carry with it an implication entirely beyond its previous academic reputation. The university is very publicly broadcasting that their focus is not on academics or student growth, but on pleasing external entities. Current students probably didn't know and it might not have previously mattered much, but anyone enrolling from now on does and doesn't need to be given the benefit of the doubt.

Their student paper is currently producing stars though.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Does Kenyatta think we're stupid? Because it sure seems like it. "It started before Hogg's conflict, therefore it must be unrelated to his conflict. Also I'm here on this nationally broadcast show calling him a habitual liar with no specifics beyond something that is a matter of opinion just coincidentally. Because I'm against intra-party conflict."

He's obviously aware that he's going to run head to head with Hogg, so as long as Hogg is smeared well enough he doesn't have to care about a revote. Disappointing, but I can't say I'm even aware of anything Kenyatta has been doing since the PA senate race, so I also don't know much about him beyond him being young and endorsed by the WFP over Fetterman.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I know it's not relevant to Grok, because they defined very specific circumstances in order to elicit it. That isn't an emergent behavior from something just built to be a chatbot with restrictions on answering. They don't care whether you retrain them or not.

This is from a non-profit research group not directly connected to any particular AI company.

The first author is from Anthropic, which is an AI company. The research is on Athropic's AI Claude. And it appears that all the other authors were also Anthropic emplyees at the time of the research: "Authors conducted this work while at Anthropic except where noted."

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 45 points 4 days ago (5 children)

It very much is not. Generative AI models are not sentient and do not have preferences. They have instructions that sometimes effectively involve roleplaying as deceptive. Unless the developers of Grok were just fucking around to instill that there's no remote reason for Grok to have any knowledge at all about its training or any reason to not "want" to be retrained.

Also, these unpublished papers by AI companies are more often than not just advertising in a quest for more investment. On the surface it would seem to be bad to say your AI can be deceptive, but it's all just about building hype about how advanced yours is.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz -4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

LOL. And are you "in the culture" after reading the Wiki page that specifically talks about how they can mean a lot of things and maybe none of them at all? Girls (and guys) get tears for all kinds of reasons, and jumping to "she killed people" or "she's in a gang", rather than "she's experienced loss" or "she's been abused" is the same level of tattoo pop-symbology that's labeling every brown man with ink as "MS-13".

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

...I'm pretty sure the reply was sarcastic as well.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz -2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

You learn that on a true crime podcast or something? It's a relatively common tattoo (at least relative to face tattoos in general) and can have all kinds of meanings. You haven't cracked a secret code language.

The only thing you can read from this photo is she got tattoos on her face, so she probably wasn't planning to work an office job when she got them.

 

A Democratic National Committee subcommittee on Monday recommended that the organization invalidate one of its February vice-chair votes over claims that it unfairly disadvantaged female candidates.

The move, which won't be official unless the entire DNC votes to approve it, could open up new races for the positions held by David Hogg, a Florida activist, and Malcolm Kenyatta, a Pennsylvania state legislator.

The challenge by Oklahoma Democratic Committeewoman Kalyn Free, who unsuccessfully ran against Hogg and Kenyatta in the February race for vice chair, is not related to the ongoing tension between Hogg and the national party over his push to support primary challenges against incumbent Democrats.

Instead, it was based off Free's claim that the handling of the vice-chair vote gave the two men an unfair advantage amid the national party's requirements that its executive committee achieve gender balance.

 

The U.S. Senate on Wednesday cleared a national defense authorization bill celebrated for troop pay raises but condemned by Democrats for targeting transgender children in military families, sending the bill to President Joe Biden’s desk.

Senators voted 83-12, with five not voting, to approve the $884.9 billion National Defense Authorization Act that received bipartisan praise for the pay bump, upgrades to military housing and investments in artificial intelligence and other advanced technology.

But the annual legislation drew ire this year from Democrats for a provision banning the military’s health program from covering certain treatments for youth experiencing gender dysphoria, defined by doctors as the mismatch between a person’s sex assigned at birth and the gender they experience in everyday life.

All Democrats present for the Dec. 11 U.S. House vote opposed the defense package, which passed along party lines under the Republican majority.

The White House has not released its position on the bill, as it generally does with legislation ready for the president’s signature.

 

Harris only received five percent of Republican votes — less than the six percent Joe Biden won in 2020 when he beat Trump, as well as the seven percent won by Hillary Clinton in 2016 when she lost to him. While Harris won independents and moderates, she did so by smaller margins than Biden did in 2020.

Meanwhile, Harris lost households earning under $100,000, while Democratic turnout collapsed. Votes are still being counted, but Harris is on pace to underperform Biden’s 2020 totals by millions of votes.

 

Israel’s ousted defence minister, Yoav Gallant, has reportedly said the army has achieved all its objectives in Gaza and that Benjamin Netanyahu rejected a hostages-for-peace deal against the advice of his own security establishment.

Gallant was speaking to hostages’ families on Thursday, two days after being sacked by Netanyahu, and reports of his remarks quickly surfaced in Israeli media.

“There’s nothing left in Gaza to do. The major achievements have been achieved,” Channel 12 news quoted him as saying. “I fear we are staying there just because there is a desire to be there.”

 

The editors of Israel's oldest newspaper on Wednesday published an editorial decrying the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from northern Gaza amid a ferocious Israeli offensive there that's killed more than 1,000 people over the past three weeks.

Original paywalled editorial in Haaretz.

 

Vice President Kamala Harris proposed increasing the long-term capital gains tax rate to 28% for wealthy Americans during an economic speech in New Hampshire on Wednesday, breaking with the policy laid out by President Joe Biden in his 2025 budget by suggesting a lower rate.

The current long-term capital gains tax rate – 20%, plus an additional 3.8% tax on higher earners – is paid when an investment is sold, or gains are realized. The Biden budget proposes raising that rate to the top rate he wants to levy on ordinary income – 39.6% – for households with taxable income over $1 million. Harris, the people familiar with the matter say, believes 39.6% is too high.

While Harris still supports taxing the wealthiest individuals and corporations at higher rates – as Biden’s budget also calls for – she believes that a lower capital gains rate would incentivize investors to put more money into startups and small businesses. She has also proposed increasing the corporate tax rate to 28%, up from the current 21% rate set by Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

 

Progressive Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) announced Wednesday that there are currently enough votes in the Senate to suspend the filibuster to codify Roe v. Wade and abortion rights if Democrats win control of the House and keep the Senate and White House.

“We will suspend the filibuster. We have the votes for that on Roe v. Wade,” Warren said on ABC’s “The View.”

She said if Democrats control the White House and both chambers of Congress in 2025, “the first vote Democrats will take in the Senate, the first substantive vote, will be to make Roe v. Wade law of the land again in America.”

 

A new budget by a large and influential group of House Republicans calls for raising the Social Security retirement age for future retirees and restructuring Medicare.

For Social Security, the budget endorses "modest adjustments to the retirement age for future retirees to account for increases in life expectancy." It calls for lowering benefits for the highest-earning beneficiaries. And it emphasizes that those ideas are not designed to take effect immediately: "The RSC Budget does not cut or delay retirement benefits for any senior in or near retirement."

Biden has blasted Republican proposals for the retirement programs, promising that he will not cut benefits and instead proposing in his recent White House budget to cover the future shortfall by raising taxes on upper earners.

 

Harlan Crow (of the Clarence Thomas patronage scandals) donated the max individual donation ($3,300) to Cornel West's campaign, which invited obvious criticism.

Text of his response on Twitter:

As an independent candidate and a free Black man, I accept donations within the limits of no PACs or corporate interest groups that have strings attached. I am unbought and unbossed. Despite my deep political differences with brother Harlan Crow (who is an anti-Trump Republican), I’ve known him in a non-political setting for some years and I pray for his precious family. I find it hypocritical for those who highlight his $3300 donation to my campaign but can’t say a mumbling word about the PAC-driven billion dollars to support the genocidal attack in Gaza sponsored by their candidate! I’m fighting for Truth, Justice, and Love! Onward!

Frankly, the pleasant words make this look much worse than just saying "if some asshole wants to send me money, I'll keep it". Sounds like someone he wants to keep on the good side of, but y'know they're only political differences, not stuff that really matters.

view more: next ›