While that is true the main reason they aren't made is not because of your stated reason, the main reason they aren't made is because you have two live metal prongs ready to kill when one end is plugged into power.
Zetta
joined 2 years ago
Its not a bit deal if you aren't completely stupid, I don't use LLMs to learn topics I know nothing about, but I do use them to assist me in figuring out solutions to things I'm somewhat familiar with. In my case I find it easy catch incorrect info, and even if I don't catch it most of the time if you just occasionally tell it to double check what it said it self corrects.
I think you're more likely to get injured in a car accident than have an issue from eating a medium burger.
This, and if you're downloading a large game, it might take a few months over a Tor.
SteamOS is a full Linux build, it's just a different distro like Fedora, Ubuntu, mint, etc, etc
Which I feel like were are at the beginning of, steam and proton are catalyzing the decade of linux right now.
To be fair, I think it's specifically Gabe who's been obsessed with brain computer interfaces for the past many years. Obviously it's his company, so Valve by extension participates.
You don't seem to understand the fact that the vast majority of humanity is still better off than we were a 1000 years ago even with the current bad.
Yeah, there's a lot of bad, but he's right. On average, the vast majority of humanity is significantly better off than we were a thousand years ago.
I understand that's how you think of it, but I'm talking about the technology itself. There is absolutely no copy of the original work, in the sense of ones and zeros.
The image generation model itself does not contain any data at all that is any of the work it was trained on, so the output of the model can't be considered copyrighted work.
Yes, you can train models to copy artists' styles or work, but it's not like tracing the image at all. Your comparison is completely wrong. It is a completely unique image that is generated off of the model itself, because the model itself does not contain any of the original work.
Is it acceptable to build a product which contains the copyrighted works of others without their permission? Is it different if the works contained in the product are programmatically transformed prior to distribution?
Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding of how image generation models and training them works is that the end product, in fact, does not contain any copyrighted material or any transformation of that copyrighted material. The training process refines a set of numbers in the model, But those numbers can't really be considered a transformation of the input.
To preface what I'm about to say, LLMs and image models are absolutely not intelligent, and it's fucking stupid that they're called AI at all. However, if you look at somebody's art and learn from it, you don't contain a copyrighted piece of their work in your head or a transformation of that copyrighted work. You've just refined your internal computers knowledge and understanding of the work, I believe the way image models are trained could be compared to that.
Was it an fpv? Trying to decipher what exploded and can't identify anything planted that blew up, but if it was an fpv I assume they would have noticed the sound.