-13

This is a repost from the matrix & mastodon channel. My account was banned on the platform “https://lemmygrad.ml” without any explanation & indefinitely after not using it for 1 or 2 days, here's my profile “https://lemmygrad.ml/u/abieNathanTheyThem”.

How can this be undone?

[-] abieNathanTheyThem@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

Cut throat environments!

[-] abieNathanTheyThem@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A. Device part of a business infrastructure:
Just don't change anything; those policy are there for a reason!

B. Consumer device:
1/ If we're talking about proprietary hardware/software forcing your network to use a specific DNS, then you need to provide more details because you should be able to change it.

2/ There is also the case for a malware:
A fresh start is preferable.
Disinfect the system while offline, then back up the needed files.
Reinstall the system on a new/old formatted drive.
With the exception of taking your privacy/security seriously this time.

[-] abieNathanTheyThem@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

Please don't share corporate media, it's a pitfall they want individuals like you & me to use those platforms to sell ourselves.

[-] abieNathanTheyThem@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

They're constructed hierarchy not natural (That hints that someone didn't want to be the fuckup alone & created a destructive system for everyone) otherwise we would be living in a socialist utopia.

I invite everyone to listen to this episode, The history of humanity with Christopher Knight https://www.historicly.net/p/the-history-of-humanity-with-christopher

2725
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by abieNathanTheyThem@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Commodification of everything you think off Past/Present/Future.

https://fosstodon.org/@jimsalter/110441094176772187

[-] abieNathanTheyThem@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mozilla opposes a proposal because it goes against their principles and vision for the Web.
They believe that any browser, server, or publisher that follows common standards should be considered part of the Web.
Standards are designed to be independent of specific hardware or software, allowing for a wide range of devices, operating systems, and browsers to access the Web.
This diversity of choices promotes accessibility and overcomes personal obstacles.
Mechanisms that restrict these choices harm the openness of the Web and are not beneficial for users.

The proposal's use cases rely on the ability to detect non-human traffic, which could hinder assistive technologies, automatic testing, and archiving and search engine spiders.
These tools require access to content intended for humans in order to transform, test, index, and summarize it.
The proposed safeguards are unlikely to be effective and fail to address these concerns adequately.

Mozilla acknowledges the importance of addressing fraud and invalid traffic but finds the proposal lacking in practical progress for the listed use cases and highlights clear downsides to its adoption.

Credit: https://chatbot.theb.ai/ just another version of https://chat.openai.com/ without the need to sign-up.

[-] abieNathanTheyThem@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Narrative built for liability reasons.

It's a crucifix to taunt the masses due to how powerless we are against the elites and their pawns.

For more contexts: St. Andrew's Cross or the Saltire Cross.

[-] abieNathanTheyThem@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So much for green while supporting unsustainability with Microsoft closed source products (Yeah there's apple too, giving that one the benefits of the doubts for now), plus the addiction industry of processed food and sugar & nootropics.

That's object-oriented neural programming, stereotypical with corporate advertisements.

[-] abieNathanTheyThem@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

There are plenty already, why not a joint?
More solidarity/less division would be nice but it doesn't mean that some individuals wouldn't need to prove themselves to the tasks.

[-] abieNathanTheyThem@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pretty sure you're describing most if not all the developer's demographics, coding can always be optimized.
The same goes for a lot of things we do in life (Productivity).

[-] abieNathanTheyThem@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If that's the case, you wouldn't be limited to a desktop.
Android users can also install the userscript using Firefox,

  1. Sign Up/In to your account & add all the necessary add-ons to the collection in it starting with the one already compatible with our browser otherwise, the list will be empty.
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/collections/
  2. Go to the Settings page, scroll down to the bottom.
  3. Tap on "About Firefox".
  4. Tap on the Firefox logo 5 times. It will display a message that says "Debug Menu enabled".
    If you go back to the Settings page, you'll notice that a new option is available under the Advanced section.
    It's called Custom Add-on Collections.
    Tap on it, and it will ask you to enter the collection owner's ID, and the collection's name.
    The ID is a unique 6-digit number that can be found in your add-on collection's URL.
    The name of course refers to the collection's name, unlike the number this is something that you can choose.
    For example,
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/collections/926754/ghacks/
    The ID for this collection is 926754 and the name is ghacks.

FYI using this method with Mull & Tampermonkey.

[-] abieNathanTheyThem@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Have you read the pfSense documentation, you do need a set of compatible hardware so the firewall becomes functional:

The best way to ensure that hardware is compatible with pfSense software is to buy hardware from the Netgate Store that has been tested and known to work well with pfSense software. The hardware in the store is tested with each release of pfSense software and is tuned for optimal performance.
For home-built solutions, the FreeBSD Hardware Notes for the FreeBSD version used in a given build of pfSense software is the best resource for determining hardware compatibility. pfSense software version 2.6.0-RELEASE is based on 12.3-STABLE@ef1e43df92c6. Another good resource is the Hardware section of the FreeBSD FAQ.

[-] abieNathanTheyThem@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
view more: next ›

abieNathanTheyThem

joined 1 year ago