angrystego

joined 2 years ago
[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Probably didn't notice it doesn't say "equals". It's easy to overlook the wavy part.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

There are many more dumb assholes than rapists. I believe people who do this just for fun, not for rape, do exist. It's quite terrible anyway.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is more difficult. Not everyone who's pro-choice thinks an unborn child is not a child. The child/fetus thing is arbitrary and can be discussed forever. Pro-choice people agree that it shouldn't limit rights of women in any case, though.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yep, that's right!

 
[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It might put California on the track to surviving Trump's destruction and becoming a civilized country opposed to Putin, unlike other US states.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just to be clear, I see polygamy as bad only because of the women oppression aspect. But the world is a big place and history is long, so I wouldn't be surprised if at some point there was some system that allowed for polygamy without oppressing women. Mentioning mormons - don't you think they can be seen as another weird different group - and therefore be also object of xenophobia? Notice I intentionally didn't use the word racism, what I mean is just the sentiment that people doing things differently than my group must be deadly wrong.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think normalizing having more partners even in a stable relationship with one partner would make it much easier to actually talk to your partner and discuss it openly, because the percentage of partners that see it as something terribly wrong would be much lower and people wouldn't feel like speaking about such things is risky. That would reduce the need for cheating, although it wouldn't make it disappear (as it's not the only cause, as someone's correctly pointed out).

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree with the part that it's really up to people. I don't agree it's ok to want people to hide their relarionships. And they do have to hide them or face problems. People who decide to live in uncommon relationships are a target for others. They often get questioned uncomfortably even by rather liberal people and attacked and bullied by conservative ones. It's really hard to do this openly. In such circumstances, I do think it's oppression. It's also not really about me. But I have eyes and empathy.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I thought the small one was a parasite - wanting the sugar. It would work as a joke with specific taxa.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

But the probability you get wed to a guy who sets you aside because bored and then marries your girlfriend out of pure respect to you is very low.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I think in western culture it might be a bit of both, and also a bit of xenophobia - it's different, so it must be bad. I'd be interested in knowing more too. Very good question.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

That's just not true. Open relationships do exist (I've seen several work out nicely) but the overall opinion on them in most cultures is they're weird, doomed or plain wrong and evil. Unless it is normalized that sex is not something fatal, it's ok among consenting adults, we won't move to a really sexually tolerant society.

 
 
 

I just started watching Discovery season 3. I was quite traumatized by the low quality of s02, but I decided to give season 3 a chance because I like most of the characters. Now comes the point. I do like Saru a lot nowadays, but at first I was put off a bit by his treatment of the tardigrade. Did any of you mind his lack of empathy for the animal? Or were you alright with him treating the creature as a resource without thinking twice? It feels kind of wrong to me when his own nation is treated as a resource on his home planet.

 

I'm using Firefox on an Android phone to view Lemmy. When I click a post at the second page of posts and go back after reading, it takes me to the first page of posts. Am I doing something wrong?

 

Why YSK: I use the web version of Lemmy both on desktop and mobile. By going directly to the 2nd page of posts, I get rid of both the neverending stream of new posts and of the same old posts that keep sticking to the 1st page. It works for all the filters: active, hot... No need to scroll down, just change the number in the end of the URL from 1 to 2 and save it to favourites or whatever.

view more: next ›