[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 hours ago

Tbh these really are low-usage features, I didn't know about any of them, aside from the snoovatars that I've always found stupid. So I don't think anyone could be pushed away from the site because of this.

OTOH, if they're low-usage, why remove them? Do they spend too much bandwidth, CPU, whatever??

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

Even though they could just make their own Lemmy communities, or ask to be appointed as mods of existing ones...

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

It has custom user-made themes that are dark mode, so it probably has dozens of dark modes.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago

Umm... return to tradition, I guess??

A fun detail: this was written by a woman, priestess Enheduanna, the first writer that we know of by name.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago

Hell, a lot of the time I just go directly to Sci-Hub / Anna's Archive because it's literally faster than searching for my university and logging in.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

This hasn't been reported on much, but I actually checked what that "competition" really was, back when the image won the prize. It was some local festival in Bumfucknowhere, USA, which among various other events (sport events, food tasting, that sort of stuff) included an art competition. I doubt the jury was made up of highly experienced art critics.

And besides, people should trust their own eyes. If you like the picture, you like it, and if you don't, you don't. Appealing to the critics as a source of objective artistic judgment is naive, and I say that as someone who has published some art criticism myself.

46

Serbian edition from 1920.

Source: http://svevid.locloudhosting.net/items/show/1840

121
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

Quite frequently I come across scanned books that are viewable for free online. For example, the publisher put them there (such as preview chapters), a library (old books from their collection that are in public domain), etc. Since I like hoarding data, and the online viewers that are used to present the book to me might not be very practical, I frequently try to download the books one way or another. This requires toying with the "inspect element" tool and various other methods of getting the images/PDF. Now, all that I access is what is, well, accessible; I don't hack into the servers or something. But - the stuff is meant to be hidden from the normal user. Does that act of hiding the material, no matter how primitive and easily circumvented, mean that I'm not allowed to access it at all?

I suppose ripping a public domain book is no big deal, but would books under copyright fare differently?

Mainly I'm asking out of curiosity, I don't expect the police to come visit me for ripping a 16th century dictionary.

Note: I live in EU, but I'd be curious to hear how this is treated elsewhere too.

Edit: I also remembered a funny trick I noticed on one site - it allows viewing PDFs on their website, but not downloading, unless you pay for the PDF. But when you load the page, even without paying, the PDF is already downloaded onto your computer and can be found in the browser cache. Is it legal to simply save the file that is already on your computer?

264
Mount and Blade: Rulerold (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
153
rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
242
3
571
Libgen is back online (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
761
aristocratic death rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
18
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

(I don't know where else to post, maybe someone here can help, and Neocities is open source...)

I want to create a site on Neocities. I fill out the signup form, solve the captcha, but when I click the "Create My Site" button, nothing happens. I click it again, and after a delay it starts loading something, but then just says "The captcha was not valid, please try again."

This happens regardless of the browser, machine or IP address I'm using.

Does anyone have any idea what might be the problem, and hopefully how to solve it? Is it just me or does anyone else have the same issue? I've sent an email to the admins two days ago, but still have gotten no reply, and I can find no info on this elsewhere online.

EDIT (20-8-2024): It's working now, probably they fixed it, woo! :D

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 123 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Absolutely the correct stance, nothing dirty about it. At this point, for better and for worse, the Internet is a basic necessity. Imagine having your water turned off because you threw water balloons at your neighbour.

1

Ne vidi se iz naslova, ali u pitanju je intervju u kojem se daje nešto konkretniji pogled na to kako su nastali i što bi se trebalo raditi na famoznim rodnim studijima.

2
Glasovi iz prošlosti Vrapča (www.portalnovosti.com)
2
[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 86 points 6 months ago

Some of these have to be trolling.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 227 points 8 months ago

At this point I'm impressed by how much effort Twitter devs must've have put into making the site shittier and less accessible.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 152 points 8 months ago

For anyone who can't find them... :D

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 89 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Damn, how did I even manage to miss that Simple apps have been bought off? I've used them for years and am still subscribed to the reddit community...

Some people suggest the action could possibly be deemed illegal, by breaking the licence the project was made under.

https://github.com/SimpleMobileTools/General-Discussion/issues/241#issuecomment-1837452672 - the dev's explanation, and replies which discuss the legal issues

https://old.reddit.com/r/fossdroid/comments/1893j2p/simple_mobile_tools_is_about_to_be_acquired/

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 131 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The last part of your comment sounds like an ad straight out of those overlong YT videos.

view more: next ›

antonim

joined 1 year ago