bloup

Nobody said it’s a conspiracy. It’s practically a natural phenomenon. Why would anybody be afraid that their child would look different from the other boys? Because they don’t want the other boys to bully him. Why do we all know that the other boys would bully him? Well, the good news is there’s a lot of research on this topic but the unfortunate thing is if you wanna learn more, you’ll have to engage with a word you don’t seem to like for some reason.

Men do it because of a fear of being different.

I think a lot of people make a very reasonable argument that a huge reason this anxiety even exists is because of patriarchy

I actually had a similar problem. In my case, though, I just asked the leaders of my neighborhood‘s local gangs if they could please have their conversations somewhere else. Luckily for me, they were cool and seemed to understand, but I guess YMMV

It’s really outrageous that it’s illegal to sell snap benefits, but Tesla can make like half of its income off of doing nothing but selling regulatory credits to other auto makers, and it’s also the only thing that is allowing them to stay afloat right now it seems like.

Hey, you did the artwork! Awesome!

to me “sea” doesn’t mean anything except for “general water region, smaller than an ocean”. I don’t think that there’s anything wrong with considering those three to be “gulfs”, but I think that people don’t usually think of them that way because unless you study the geography carefully, you might not even notice that they actually are connected to the rest of the ocean.

by the way, fun fact: there is actually a sea that isn’t connected to the ocean and why we don’t call it a lake, I really don’t understand. but that’s the Caspian Sea.

The “arm Britain and prolong the war” sign reads to me like the person holding it is campaigning to prolong the war for as long as possible, and the best way they think that we can go about it is by arming Britain.

Does that mean the composer of a symphony is not an artist because (especially the most successful ones) don’t usually often get to control the gestalt of the performance? The ironic thing is in music composition trying to control the gestalt of the performance too much is considered tacky, like a screenplay with too much scene direction. Ironically, we also have the question by this reasoning, if the author of a screenplay is an artist.

as a multimedia artist, I have long been frustrated with the philosophical shallowness of pure visual artists’ understanding of what art is because it never actually is something that is inclusive of plenty of things that everyone agrees is obviously art. Like almost everything in performance art (performing/producing/composing music, directing films, theater in general, etc) for instance. And in the performing arts we’ve understood for literally thousands of years the difference between the artwork, which is the execution of a concept, and the artwork which is the concept itself.

The biggest irony, though in my opinion, is that during the mid 20th century, the visual arts had a movement which is still ongoing (and as actually produced several notable modern works of art that you probably have heard of before, like the banana taped to the wall called “Comedian”) called conceptualism, which directly challenges, the exact sorts of ideas you’re expressing about art. One of my favorite artists of all time is called Sol Lewitt. He was a conceptual artist and one of his most famous works was a series called “the wall drawings” which were just illustrations that exist existed only as sets of instructions for people to follow, the idea that every “performance” of the concept is just as valid an art artwork as the concept itself. Which by the way is literally how we think of music and live theater as art already so there’s precedent for this, clearly.

“The idea becomes a machine that makes the art.” -Sol LeWitt. Really wonder what this guy would have to say about AI generated images, like imagine showing him a piece which is one of his wall drawings as rendered by several different generative AI models just to really make you think about the nature of art itself and what it even is. and in my opinion that’s really what art is about: connecting with people and sharing your ideas with them, using literally any means that are at you’re disposal. and if it’s really thoughtless, and you just used cheap tools to generate something really fast that ripped off pirated media in a manner that would get any one of us sent to prison, that doesn’t make it not art. it just makes it probably really bad art. But why are we so insistent on this exclusive definition of art? I don’t really understand.

if Trump is pledging to kill the federal EV incentive and this truck is an answer to it then the article should provide the price without incentives. But even if it’s just under $20,000 with incentives, I still feel like it’s unfortunately paying more for less at the moment. Although if there’s tariffs, it might actually be cheaper than literally anything else you could get so in that situation, why not?

I read a lot of technical material that has lots of diagrams and it’s difficult with an E reader paging back-and-forth between the text and the diagram that I’m trying to understand

I never understood why nobody made an E reader that you could read “like a book” that just had two screens and a hinge

Intensive Battery Brooding by Carcass