this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
272 points (99.3% liked)

Television

1083 readers
376 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 63 points 5 days ago (4 children)

AppleTV was stupid to let him go. If they had any balls they’d offer to pick up the Daily Show.

[–] dingus182@lemmy.world 44 points 5 days ago

Apple didn't have the balls for honesty, previously. Doubt they have 'em now that JS is on TDS.

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Apple picks their battles specifically with brand identity in mind, which has its ups and downs, but they do have some brass ones and you have to admit it. Let's not all forget the FBI notice they posted on the main page of Apple.com with a letter explaining why they were not going to be developing a backdoor in iOS and wouldn't be gagged. In fact, I just checked, and they're still hosting it. https://www.apple.com/customer-letter/

[–] AZX3RIC@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You make an excellent point about Apple protecting their brand identity and then say:

but they do have some brass...

As if them pushing back against the FBI is putting their brand at risk, it is not. They tout privacy, that letter is 100% PR, reaffirming to their customers that privacy matters.

Protecting their brand, your original point, is why they're afraid of people like Jon. Comedy Central isn't a name that is going to grab headlines, but, click bait headlines about Apple and controversy absolutely will, using Jon Stewart as a vehicle.

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I'm not sure what you're trying to say, but yes. I'm saying they have a pair of brass ones but only swing them when it suits their brand image. Jon Stuart, as you've surmised, didn't get the protection in my opinion because he threatened their brand image with his piece on China.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 6 points 5 days ago

They weren't stupid. The CCP would have pulled a bunch of their investments if they didn't.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

Yes, but Apple is not these things. They are spineless corporate shills lying to their users and pandering to predominantly dumb people.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 42 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Does anyone think he’s got the influence to make his own streaming studio?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Just imagine Conan, Colbert, Stewart, and Oliver on one podcast network.

[–] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

They should go to dropout.tv

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works -4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ugh, please no... No more podcasts.

Tv network, though? Hell yes.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

As of you don't watch both of these things from the same devices...

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 17 points 5 days ago

I think he's probably got the influence to start his own network.

[–] bloup 20 points 5 days ago

I do, but I doubt he’ll actually do it

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It's amazing to me that network TV even exists anymore...

We had a local FM radio host that was fired a few years ago. Started up a podcast immediately and it was way more entertaining and more lucrative than his radio show ever was.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago

I don't think it's a question of if he has the influence. He obviously does. There are few people who have earned the loyalty Stewert has, both in audience and, seemingly, in production.

The question is whether he wants to. I think it'd probably be too much for him to want to do now. Maybe he could just get others to handle it and just let it use his name though? It'd be great if he could establish something where people like him are allowed to speak freely without worrying that much about what the owners will do. Sure, they still couldn't piss off every sponsor, but they would be a lot more free.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Maybe Stewart and Colbert can team up again

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Colbert to Daily Show confirmed!

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago

The Daily Repore

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You cancel Daily Show, I cancel cable. I've been a top tier cable customer for 25 years because of South Park, the Daily Show, and reruns. I was genuinely upset when Craig Kilborn left the show. I got over it. I don't pay for any streaming services because they all fucked me over too. I'll go back to piracy if I have to. I started on dial up, I have all the patience in the world and a massive stolen and pirated DVD collection to tide me over.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 17 points 5 days ago

You are invited to selfhosted@lemmy.world whenever you need to optimize your piracy efforts, king.

[–] proper@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

wouldn’t you say i’ve been kicked out of better places?

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No, because that implies this establishment is better than most.

[–] proper@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

pardon my lack of comprehension, if applicable, but to say “i’ve been kicked out of worse” puts the place in question higher on the list of places doesn’t it?

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

'Kicked out of ~~worse~~ better' implies that the speaker [Jon] has been moving down the rankings of places.

But I think the real intent is self-deprecating, to say he's happy to play shitty venues to reach his audience, and won't be bought by fancy trimmings to perform for a bunch of elitist snobs or to temper his message to avoid offending them.

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Or that perhaps what is generally considered "un-shitty" is not where he's going to do his best work. Prestige has it's advances, but it can end up as a pair of golden handcuffs.

I used to listen to John Oliver recording news podcasts in a basement under Murdoch HQ, and he did some absolutely phenomenal work in that time.

For example he coined the term "fuck-eulogy".

[–] Gaja0@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Paramount bad