Why is the president commenting about it to the news? And why is the President helping escalate to an even wider war?

If the point was to limit the spread of conflict, I can't imagine the US joining Isreal in opening more war-fronts will accomplish that goal.

I think that's an unhelpful narrative. I think a better narrative is people who needed help and got it, improved their community.

The residents of Springfield have needed help for a long time and haven't gotten nearly enough and that's why things hadn't gotten better until now. The immigrants who have arrived and improved things are people who got the help they needed.

.... why. Just why.

As someone who's regularly been to Springfield, oh over the last decade. It's not a beautiful place, it hasnt been for a long time. Most of downtown had been hollowed out and turned into parking lots, other buildings are deep in disrepair, which is contributing reason why it's not recovered as quickly as neighboring cities like Dayton, Urbana, and Xenia.

It's a hard hit rust belt city, long dealing with addiction and other deaths of despair.

I had to dig into the issue tracker to find the "non-political" and "anti-woke" messaging.

Oh look, a reactionary Godot fork that uses the name of a crypto exchange. They say it's not political but what they mean is it won't be "woke".

Atleast it'll be easy to identify companies that don't deserve my money.

This is step 4 of 5

Fair enough, I did mean Nintendo Haters as a compliment. It is the morally correct position.

I'm pro fuck Nintendo, what boot?

I literally run a project I'm waiting to get one of these legal threats about.

I can't name the last time someone has died in a "stampede". It's probably all the egress and occupancy regulations we have to mitigate them.

Any problem I've ever had printing is almost exclusively a problem with the printer, it's usually yellow or cyan. Doesn't matter the document is black&white.

I'm fairly certain they knew they couldn't win and that's why they didn't bother to respond.