it's the same type of non-performative speech you see when any company says "we value our customer's complaints", or "we work hard to have a diverse and inclusive team", as if by merely saying these things that it magically becomes true
ah but meta has cracked it this time; if they just say "we never sell your info" that means they don't, right?
yeah it's pretty messy
there was an original condition called "autism" which referred to the stereotypical, ""low functioning"" case where someone has intellectual disabilities and the rest
then a ""high functioning"" variant was labelled, where the intellectual disability was missing, called "asperger's syndrome"
then more and more inbetween cases started being labelled like rett syndrome, CDD, PDD-NOS, and so they had to say "fuck it, it's all "autism spectrum disorder" now"
over time, "autism" has become shorthand for ASD. to avoid confusion, the OG autism sometimes gets described as "classic autism"
honestly it's all a big mess
the issue with death penalty is that even if you have a perfect state that makes zero mistakes when applying such penalty, it can only do so in the context of a criminal offense having been committed.
but what is a criminal offense? one person's "that's a crime" is another person's "i should be free to do that"
for example, in yemen, if you are caught performing homosexual acts as a married man, you are to be stoned to death.
in principle, a capital punishment supporter should also be okay with this.
if you are one of those who has just caught yourself saying "well... i think death penalty is okay but not like that" then you have just hit my main point like a brick wall
if the decision to apply death penalty is based on one's subjective assessment of what a crime is, then that's not rational or fair
here's some homework for you - replace "death penalty" with "any penalty" and re-run my thought sequence again :)
the very act of "criminalizing" is fraught with moral issues already, so i think we should drop all death penalties until we have perfectly solved the question "what is crime?"
for further info, here's a good one (link here, clicky!)
they all have this haircut too
i will be truthful, i had lost complete confidence in the instance after seeing the crashes back in december. i had moved to using lemmy anonymously since then, to "wait and see" if i had to setup an account elsewhere.
seeing this though? full confidence restored. π
i am glad there is now more than one single point of failure. i hope that this adventure becomes a valuable lesson to other instances that have just one admin running everything. if you're reading this, and your instance has one admin - you need to fix that, yesterday!
once you have an OpenCollective or something like it setup, i will be able to contribute. make sure to let us know when a fresh donation link is up (because i don't trust the old ko-fi link in the sidebar)
thank you so much for your hard work. β€οΈ
i wanted to add my personal experience, as someone who tried kbin and then ended up on lemmy
when learning about fediverse, i was first introduced to kbin. i assumed that kbin was a close match to reddit, and this was why i was being introduced to it. turns out, nope! it also has some microblogging thing? active people? boost vs favourites? i was bamboozled to say the least.
i'm sure the dual-purpose threads + microblogging is good for some, but i'm really, really not into twitter. and i also found it to be confusing when i was tagged in something as to whether i was reading a thread, or a microblog. i.e, kbin wasn't a good fit. then i discovered most of the actual content i was reading on kbin was being posted from some "lemmy" service? i clicked to find out more and... yeah, i made the switch pretty quickly.
basically, not all of us went back to reddit. i can't speak for all former reddit users, but one of the detracting points for kbin was the mixed purpose. like, for example, if i was to list places like facebook, twitter, instagram, even mastodon - these are all "people" focused places. you post about people, and the focus is more skewed towards following individual people and trends. if i was to list places like reddit, hackernews, something awful, even... 4chan... - these are "things" focused places. you post about things, and the focus is on following things. lemmy is firmly in the "things" camp, whereas kbin is trying to be both "people" and "things" at once, and so it just wasn't for me. π
a Catholic health care system
is this like where the doctors and nurses have to be of the religion, or does the hospital get to decide who gets treated using their own rules? or something else? can someone explain this?
either way, what the fuck?
op, it's not just you, i promise. π
i encourage you to watch this in it's entirety. while it covers a different life story, it explores some avenues of what you are possibly feeling when you ask this question.
it's tempting to think digitization is forever, but we've already lost so much of the internet to link rot and server shutdowns in just 30 years. paper is actually longer lasting than digital, lol
this screenshot will be from a 4chan style board. this image is from the catalog view. [R] indicates number of replies, [I] indicates number of replies that also have an image attached.
for example, r13i2 indicates there's 13 total replies, of which 2 replies contain an image alongside any text
i got you, watch this for understanding of kelly criterion
nice! i am now all paid up. feels gooood π
thank you both for your hard work β€οΈ
and absolutely, don't feel guilty at all for repaying both of your personal costs from the budget. the point of open collective is so that we can see that you are making payments within reason. in my opinion, that includes compensating yourself for the personal expenses prior to today, so that it retroactively restores the funding back to being equitable
if you could give us a rough idea of what that personal expense was, i'd appreciate that