How is actual with direct bank imports? Are you in the US or EU?

Ah, yes, I live on “St Mary’ ; DROP TABLE street”

Do you perhaps have Resist Fingerprinting or Strict Enhanced Tracking Protection turned on?

I was never able to get videoconferencing sites working with any combination of those (on Linux), so I just use a vanilla Chrome instance just for videoconferencing.

Isn’t this basically how lisp works?

Don’t kink-shame the furries!

I think the glass doors on the refrigerated coolers that were electronic displays that showed you an ideal image of the drink or whatever was supposed to be inside, but you couldn’t see through them to see if there were any actually on the shelf.

He did say he was doing it to learn. Maybe when he’s done he will be able to appreciate what goes into making a viable browser.

Avoid the Noid

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Noid

https://mbasic.facebook.com/ still works. It's missing some modern niceties, but usable. That's what I use for occasional messages.

Like Myst? I love those. Have you tried The Witness?

If you get the sha256 from the same place you got the main file, then anyone tampering with the main file could also recalculate the sha256 to match the tampered file. A signature signed with a certificate uses complex math (public-key asymmetric cryptography) to give some certainty that the signed content (the sha256) is the same sha256 that the original file author created. It’s not mathematically feasible to recalculate the certificate signature. Why don’t we just sign the whole original file with the public-key crypto and skip the sha256? Because asymmetric crypto is much, much slower than plain symmetric crypto or hash functions. It’s faster and easier to generate the valid hash or key, then sign or encrypt just the smaller key.

Real programmers curl unverified shell scripts into bash.