dupelet_comments

Sorry, as an Asian I honestly thought Mexico was in South America. I don't think we touched the americas more than one day in geography class.

So like, 50%?

So this comm approves of gaslighting, I see

There's definitely some bad actors in food packaging, though. In some countries, it's insane how hard it is to differentiate between butter and some non-dairy spread at the grocery.

'Just look for the port that fits the cable!'

That's not what profiteering means

You could just pop it open in your browser... don't even need an account.

Yes, but the ruling stated that they violated defamation rules, which implies defamation did happen.

The question I was asking is, how is it defamation if it's true. You seem to have wandered off onto a tangent of what constitutes ethical / civilised advertising.

one can easily see what happens when it is allowed to talk about your enemies instead of what you provide. Just look at the logical end of this in form of the attack ads of the US political campaigns.

More countries than not allow comparative advertising, and the world is not ending. Why use politics as an inaccurate example when the majority of countries actually practice it to some extent?

The question was how is it defamation, you're giving a non-answer that's nothing more than a blatant appeal to authority.

So if an ad were to make fun of how horrible Tesla's Full Self Driving feature is, that would be unfair and misleading? As opposed to the pain simple truth?