Burning in nuclear fire has not traditionally been seen as a drawback among the ncd commentariat
Ideally there'd be a config option to switch, but if I had to choose one I'd like Sync to follow the lemmy color scheme.
I think they meant until today π₯ π
The Seychelles pull up their anchor and steam north
What they're saying, as far as I can tell, is that after training the model on 85% of the dataset, the model predicted whether a participant had an ASD diagnosis (as a binary choice) 100% correctly for the remaining 15%. I don't think this is unheard of, but I'll agree that a replication would be nice to eliminate systemic errors. If the images from the ASD and TD sets were taken with different cameras, for instance, that could introduce an invisible difference in the datasets that an AI could converge on. I would expect them to control for stuff like that, though.
But it has been peer reviewed? And the criteria have been defined?
The article seems to be published in JAMA network open, and as far as I can tell that publication is peer reviewed?
gif.
cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/6284248
Mirror:
The board that fired him was that of the nonprofit, so they don't answer to shareholders.
Death crap
Presumably the Nefnanafnanefnd
ππ§βππ«π§βπ