elkien

Cool, I may test their basic plan and see how it goes. And yeah, I'm aware of the issue of email servers being blacklisted, I indeed did the experiment before moving to Proton and experienced precisely that.

Mine concern with self-hosting is on how unpractical it will become overtime, I self host already several services but I'm sort of aware that going the route of self-hosting with regards to email it's going to involve being a bit more hands-on.

Thanks for the heads-up on Mailbox.org, looks interesting and it's good see another European service on this space. Wished they offered an option for Email-only (with contacts maybe as long as I can sync them with my server) with higher storage capacity. From their website the bigger capacity plans include and online drive and an office suite, things I already have solutions for I don't want/need a third-party to be in charge of.

Yeah, I know emails will navigated unencrypted outside of my server (in case I decide self-host), encryption at rest is muy first priority with the added benefit that those other using the same server (i.e. family) can also get end-2-end encryption

But as I said I'm not ready, my current homelab server is already reaching capacity and I know that a wrongly configured SMTP will get blacklisted and then good luck (happened already once with another domain)

Anyway, I'm not giving up that just yet but in the meantime just wanted to know about other providers as potential alternatives.

I've always seen as that as a scapehatch for one of the most typical issues with ORMs, like the the N+1 problem, but I never fully bought it as a real solution.

Mainly because in large projects this gets abused (turns out none or little of the SQL has a companion test) and one of the most oversold benefits of ORMs (the possibility of "easily" refactor the model) goes away.

Since SQL is code and should be tested like any other code, I rather ditch the whole ORM thing and go SQL from the beginning. It may be annoying for simple queries but induces better habits.

If the rise of techno-lords of this neo-feudalist era hasn't made it clear to people why privacy is important then it isn't even worth having the conversation with those people anyway. Privacy is an spectrum and 100% privacy is extremelly difficult to achieve and potentially not worth pursuing to the average people unless your life or someone else's you love is under threat.

But while 100% is not worth it to the average people, getting very close to it isn't super difficult nowadays granting you have or know someone with the technological knowledge to achieve it: Nowadays you can use Firefox with proper adblocker extensions for free, get a phone that is de-googled out of the box, you can switch social networks from centralised ones to federated ones, self-host a lot of cloud services very cheaply, etc. True that some technical knowledge (and time) is required to achieve a decent level of privacy. Finding the time isn't that difficult if one cares a little (they are one online search away), the technical bit is the hard one and maybe a good reason for those of us that self-host to start federating more and more services (but this is another conversation). The fact is, who nowadays doesn't care about privacy is because they have chosen to do so.

So if the conversation even arises, I sometimes flip it by pointing out how shitty their preferred online service (or even operating system) has become in the recent years, just to tell them I have a totally different online experience than them. If they are curious I can show them how, if not, then they shouldn't care about me as it's obvious they don't care about themselves in the first place.