fishos

joined 2 years ago
[–] fishos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

For all the downvotes, you don't have this problem on PC. Getting headshots, even while driving, is crazy easy. It's very much a controller issue. Mouse and Keyboard controls are very precise.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I love how I've never heard of this one but here you are plastering the instructions right for everyone to see.

A little bit of advice: don't spread the enemies propaganda. You should maybe look up the Streisand Effect. Unless you're presenting a bullet proof rebuttal/way to 100% way to defeat this, you're only helping to spread it further.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Bro, did you seriously compare small sedans to a small pickup that people are actually asking for?

....I'd continue this but it's clear your comprehension is lacking.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And who lobbies for lower emissions regulations so that they can sell bigger polluting trucks while consumers constantly say "where's my small car?"? Who lobbies the government to give them subsidies that make the meat so cheap that it's the best option for the consumer vs plant based protein?

Everything a person could do in these instances is being done in the opposite direction 1000x more and you sit here and go "but people!"

But sure, I'll just whip out my checkbook and lobby some politicians and change this myself. And I'll eat less meat while the people going to the climate conferences all fly their own private jets to it and create more pollution in a day than I will in a lifetime. That'll really show em!

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No. Individuals make up <1% on their own. You want to make a difference? Target the 99%. This is just bullshit propaganda like telling us recycling is our duty instead of corporations producing less junk.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Yes, let's focus of men vs women instead of individuals vs corporations.

I thought we were past this "it's the individuals fault despite corporations producing the vast, vast majority" bullshit.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Umm .... My first post: maybe stop attacking everyone and you'd find more supporters. That is an argument. But you've been too busy... checks notes ...attacking me endlessly. I started by critiquing someone saying males are too insecure to be governed by a woman. That maybe that kind of inflammatory language doesn't help. And..... Here you are being inflammatory and wondering why you aren't winning.

Hmmmmmmmmmmm.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

And yet when told I disagree with you you immediately go off about maga Nazis. That's your strawman. You can't stop foaming at the mouth about it while other Democrats are trying to have an actual conversation with you. Some of you are just as rabid as the people you hate.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Agreed. About the only thing I would search Lemmy for is obnoxious Linux snobbery. That, they have on lock.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You need to remember first of all what sites like reddit, digg, and now Lemmy actually are. They are link aggregators. The content is anything and every thing. Just link to it. It's that simple. And if you feel it is in a place that might get removed, screenshot it, archive.org it, copy into an online Google Doc, and post that. There's no reason we need 500 identical "How do I do X?" posts just to fill content. Do you want 500 posts clogging your feed about how to fix the same printer issue over and over?

[–] fishos@lemmy.world -4 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Another great strawman. I'm a registered Democrat. Thank you for proving my point. Because only a conservative could disagree with you /s

[–] fishos@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago

I'll chose having values and standing for something, yes.

view more: next ›