8

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt24053860/

I think it's a lot closer to The Day of the Jackal (1973) in spirit. Far far superior to The Jackal (1997 film).

I'm halfway through but still not feeling the romance story of the Jackal and his wife though. Think the show could have done better without it.

[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

He didn't even give a single citation. I decry sanctus@lemmy.world worse than the Republicans in the article.

A single group photo of Republicans would have been the bare minimum to back up his claim.

78

Staff Pick Comment:

You essentially can't perform a randomized controlled trial on masking during a pandemic for a LOT of reasons.

  1. Your institutional review board would never approve it because there's enough evidence of masks reducing disease spread generally that it would be considered placing participants at risk of harm for limited scientific benefit.
  2. You would have largely insurmountable confounders, ESPECIALLY during a pandemic when there are likely to be rules people need to follow regardless of what mask group they were randomly assigned to.
  3. Behavioral confounders would be enormous. Since people would be randomly assigned to a mask group, and participation must necessarily be voluntary; the only participants would be people who don't care about wearing or not wearing a mask or truly don't have any opinion about if it's safe or dorky looking or socially unacceptable in their circle to be seen wearing/not wearing a mask. The sample would not be at all representative of most people.
  4. Adherence would be terrible. The same applies to virtually any study about diet, activity, changing habits, dependence on things like caffeine or nicotine, etc. If participants don't follow the prescribed behavior of their randomized group the data gets weaker and weaker until there is no longer any visible signal.
  5. Even if all else was solved by magic, the study would still not be blinded. People would know if they're wearing a mask or not and those around them would also know. This would create it's own set of confounders.

Observational data is likely to be the best and only data you can get on this topic. To throw it out because it's not randomized and controlled is to admit that you have no idea what any of these words mean or how such studies are conducted.

[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 2 days ago

I think people will change their mind when presented with facts

124
Chat Control Being Voted on Tomorrow (www.consilium.europa.eu)
16

Finally Finished Horizontal & Vertical MCRN Logos

Image

Image

Now to figure out if I'm going to get a long sleeve T-shirt with the vertical version down the left side, sweat pants with it down the front of the leg or the horizontal version across the chest of a T-shirt. The vertical was the tough one to make with so much sizing and spacing to be adjusted manually.

I learned a bunch of tricks in Irfanview along the way.

50

from the reimagining-the-first-amendment dept

59

from the drug-warriors-will-need-to-be-a-little-less-obvious-from-now-on dept

116
-9
22
51
11
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/acab@lemmy.ml
7
[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 week ago

That is a terrible idea. The basic privacy advice is to use end to end encryption wherever possible.

[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

his family is obviously devastated

Maybe it might even be a slam dunk life insurance payout.

spoilerGIF of woody harrison crying and drying his tears with US $100 bills.

[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 75 points 1 week ago

bUt iF MeXiCo sIgNs a dEfEnSe pAcT WiTh gUaTeMaLa tHeN ThAt's bAsIcAlLy aN AtTaCk oN Us! AnD We'lL NuKe tHeM If wE'Re aTtAcKeD.

[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh my god! They're going to be so embarrassed. I mean that's a crazy accident. /s

[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 week ago

Wait till they learn about seahorses

[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 month ago

No longer letting my family member rants about [insert today's Russian propaganda] go unchallenged.

  • Crime is going up. Oh no, can you show me a chart with a source? Can't be just something you find on the internet (they're always ranting that you can't trust the internet).
  • You can't trust the weather reports. They're just using the internet to make all that stuff up. Explain how the internet allows for a 100 fold increase in sensors that can report back to a centralized meteorology facility for number crunching
  • Ukraine shot first Explain a timeline of the Ukraine war
  • Moon landing was faked. (I actually like this argument the best because it's been so thoroughly debunked)
[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 month ago

One of the many reasons why I lost all faith in a person when I realize they're a conspiracy theorist.

The goddamn government tracking plans are on fucking wikipedia and they're worried about chips injected in a vaccine from some twitter shitpost.

view more: next ›

florencia

joined 1 month ago