[-] foofy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Firefox can do without Google being the default fine. What they can't do without is all the money that Google pays them to make Google be the default.

[-] foofy@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

He may have PTSD and he may have had 1,000 hours of firearms training, but if you empty your magazine the way he did, under the circumstances he did, you're incompetent to be a police officer. Period.

And even he apparently recognizes that since he resigned (though whether he'll just go get hired the next town over is probably a decent bet).

[-] foofy@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

It's a race to the bottom.

Yes, you can decline to opt in, but the guy next to you (or the guy next to him) will opt in and sell his AI voice package for less than it costs to employ a real person. And unlike a real person, the AI voice package can work 24/7 on 10,000 productions at the same time.

If anyone can opt in, then no one can really opt out.

Is this a good thing? For the bottom line of the people making the games, sure. And maybe 3% of that savings will trickle down to the consumer.

But it's pretty bad for the voice actors.

[-] foofy@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

I don't 3d print but I wanted to give you props for a super high effort post. This is really cool. If I did have a 3d printer I'd give this a try.

Have you thought about a version with blade storage? It's always handy to have a place to stash an extra blade or two to quickly swap out a dull one.

[-] foofy@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

The latest fad.

[-] foofy@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

The board has given no real reasoning for why they fired him. Until they do, there's no reason anyone should consider this anything other than an internal power struggle that resulted in a coup.

And Sam didn't have a job anymore. Why shouldn't he go work for Microsoft? He was pushed out of OpenAI, is he contractually bound to never do something different?

[-] foofy@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

There's something in the article about auto-delete policies.

If those policies violated a recordkeeping requirement maybe a jury could infer it was done intentionally in furtherance of a crime

Or maybe even if it was set to auto delete messages after some really unusually short period. By that I mean if you configured it to delete messages after a few days it might be hard to explain the legitimate business purpose served by such a rule.

[-] foofy@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

Homer enters a steak eating contest (but loses), the joke here is that the guy there (Big Red or something?) won but he's actually dead. Homer, feeling responsible, takes over his job driving his Big Rig across the country and discovers an industry secret

[-] foofy@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

The real scam is that that video is 15 min long.

[-] foofy@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Indicted in 2016 on witness coercion and the case is still "pending"...? Can I be forgiven for thinking there was no intent on ever bringing that to trial?

[-] foofy@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I'm pretty sure it just drop ships you Chinese garbage from alibaba.

[-] foofy@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Because that's what the supreme court ruled in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen.

They just made that up, but that's where we're at now.

view more: next ›

foofy

joined 1 year ago