The flatpak size disadvantage is negligible in the age of terabytes

the issue is overstated as most flatpaks use the flatpak platform runtimes and share their own libraries in a similar manner to the host, yes its separate libraries, but its not dozens of disparate copies like some detractors of flatpak seem to state

Microsoft is a cloud provider these days, Windows doesn't make enough money, that's why they are desperate to monetise already paying customers.

Azure/entra or whatever the fuck they call it this week is where the real money comes from

Don't know if this counts - used Fedora KDE for about a decade and then last year moved to Fedora Kinoite. It's essentially the same, but is OSTree based and immutable. I like the solid base, the rebasing function and containers

they were also home of all the movies at one point and that changes every few months, and by region. Accountants going to Accountant

It is my understanding that Infertile is not necessarily sterile

I drive an EV (not a tesla) and I agree. I have it primarily because its cheaper to run.. My ancient previous car didn't owe me anything, I ran it into the ground.

More for tiling 3 windows across it, or editing a long document

... I have played raiden on it a few times

not to be that guy, but on Enterprise they were called hand scanners or just scanners

Good talk on the subject Benno is very engaging

how will I read the instructions a vendor sent me for a windows server that is a word doc because who knows? Oh no... Anyway

Things like androidpay/apple pay type functions require a chain of security checks, on Android it's levels of safety net. some banking apps require similar

I feel like Sean is the kind of guy I could geek out with