Welcome back comrade, remember this https://hexbear.net/comment/757569 ? 4 fucking years ago ey.
Welp i'm trans now. Thanks for making me read Feinberg lmao. Somehow that's not what finalized cracking my egg, but it was a little step along the way. Hope you're well.
donated what i could to all of them, very good initiative to pin this instead of the usual megathreads.
Love to you all, one day we will see the children free. 
Because the friends i recommended it to are libs and i'm trying my best to remove the brainworms, if they see this guy as a reference and see him supporting this idea it will give it more credit when they already lean into believing the propaganda. So i'm just hoping this is only one L and that they don't come across it.
Fuck. Thank you for saying I had no idea. I recommended his book to friends..
Why can't you listen to him, is there something I missed about him? Seen his book recommended a bunch. Genuine question I want to make sure I know if he's shit.
My condolences and love to you, your husband and all of your friend's loved ones. I'm so sorry.
They'll pay for what they did.
Not only is the summary kinda light or missing the deeper points, the LLM did not "break down" the plot by "reading" the provided PDF. House of Leaves is impossible to fucking parse correctly as a PDF, the text is all over the place, visually placed in very complex ways, you have a whole labyrinth chapter where you have to follow footnotes across multiple pages with the text being difficult to find and follow, anything "reading" the PDF in the regular order of characters would have no fucking clue.
As always, there is no intelligence or any breaking down, the only reason the LLM is able to provide the summary is because it was trained on a dataset that included summaries and reviews of House of Leaves, and it simply detected the PDF was House of Leaves.
The LLM is, YET AGAIN, just regurgitating things that are already written elsewhere, nothing is created, it's all obfuscation of labour.
That's not at all why people are talking about it what the fuck? It has nothing to do with seeing the clean-up of the river as "wasteful spending", it's because everyone fucking hates Macron lmao.
The "clean-up of the Seine" is a recurring joke, multiple presidents and mayors of Paris have promised it over the decades and it never ends up happening, and this time as well everyone laughed and said "if we actually see him swim in it, I'll eat my hat".
It's because we hate macron, and it's because people really dislike the Olympics as well. The olympics are wasteful spending, very badly organized, and they're going to a complete shit show to the delight of everyone outside Paris, myself included.
Hey so macron just announced he's dissolving the assembly, snap elections the 30th of this month
Lmao
Edit: this came as an announcement right after the european election results in france where the far right had a huge victory, i'm not really sure what his plan/strategy is, with this timing it feels like it's going be very easy for the far-right to organize and the left is a clusterfuck right now.
Keep going dude, I think you should try to be a little more insufferable and smarmy, you've almost reached a new record
Look I don't know how useful or "good" is it to be extremely aggro on twitter/nitter like Roderic usually is, but he's right.
I can never really fault him for it, it's a dumb social media and there's not much point to it if you don't actually engage with people and are able to criticize what they say, especially when talking about influencial people with a platform. And yea, he's very aggro, but his original response is not really directed at JP as a person, just angry and critical at the ideas he's peddling, and for good reason.
JP's reponse is a pretty typical one for western leftists. Criticism is seen as an attack, it is always reinterpreted in an individualistic lens. Attacking someone's really dumb or dangerous idea is immediately rolled back with "woah there calm down maybe you could be civil" as if the person criticizing is being mean, rude, or violent, when often (as is the case here) that's not the case. If you're going to talk about political things and ideas like there, and someone tells you publically "This is completely wrong and dangerous what the fuck", your response shouldn't be "Why are you attacking me?". Criticism is not a conflict, it's not a fight, it's not personal, and it is extremely important and necessary.
Omg you're here too!
Hope you're well