[-] hayes_@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Bad company 2 nooooo!

Admittedly haven’t checked in for ~a year but last I checked that game still rips. “Portal” or whatever it’s called in the new one captures none of the magic.

RIP

[-] hayes_@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Shrug, it’s been a while and I don’t remember which affected my decision at the time.

[-] hayes_@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

Personal anecdote:

When I initially decided to drop Chrome, I moved to Brave because - as a chromium-based browser - it supported the same set of extensions I’d grown accustomed to.

That being said, the crypto stuff weirded me out enough that, once I’d weaned myself off the extensions, I switched to Firefox.

[-] hayes_@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Eh, you’re both right.

You’re both saying the same thing, but your message was sarcastic/cynical and to an extent, self-defeatist.

I don’t have a horse in this race, but I also observe that comments like the one you made generally result in zero subsequent conversation of the root post’s content.

[-] hayes_@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe my opinion is dated/anecdotal.

My belief re: critics comes from early days of Tesla, when the concept of a fast ev was very foreign to most auto journalists. So, most of the reviews were something along the lines of “I wanted to hate this car, but goddamn if it isn’t faster than insert critic’s favorite sports car and way more useful too. I’m converted.”

Re: people in general, I’m basing it off of people I know who own them. That’s admittedly a very small sample size (~a dozen), but their opinions are the polar opposite of what you’ll find on random Internet forums. There’s definitely selection bias going on in both directions.

For what it’s worth, I’m very aware of the QA issues and no I don’t own a Tesla myself.

[-] hayes_@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

They moderate rigorously.

Participating in one of their threads is like attending a university course.

Most people don’t have the context to actually participate in the discussions, but the quality is on a completely different level.

[-] hayes_@lemmy.world 162 points 1 year ago

Damn this thread is negative as hell.

I’m one of the most cynical, pessimistic people I know, but not in here.

Kinda wish people’s first reaction were “good,” not “yeah right, remember Bell in the 80’s?”

Maybe I’m naive, but this seems like good news to me. Even if it doesn’t actually result in Amazon being broken up, at least it indicates someone is doing something.

“Don’t let perfection be the enemy of progress” or something like that.

[-] hayes_@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I wouldn’t group doordash in with the others.

They barely provide a service; leach off of restaurants, forcing them to raise their prices to maintain razor thin margins; and lobby for shitty legislation to not pay or give people benefits.

I agree with the general point, though.

[-] hayes_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Data storage/hosting isn’t free…

[-] hayes_@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Pet peeve of mine: nothing about this is “ironic.”

If the author really wants an adverb, I’d probably go with “unsurprisingly.”

[-] hayes_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Cute pup! Get him a seatbelt.

[-] hayes_@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago

This message has been brought to you by hydrohomies.

view more: next ›

hayes_

joined 1 year ago