if it is an energetic startup they are called prompt wizards

imagine now somehow combining its sensor data with outputs from a LLM everyone would think that their roomba has become sentient

"I have a great idea"

what if realistically speaking the only current choice is between even a worse situation in middle east vs maybe slightly better than the status quo? I know it sucks but without changing how the elections in US works, you are not going to go from democrats vs republicans to a progressive major party in one election. In one election your only chance is to get slightly closer to it or quite further away.

Doesn't help if your plan not to support genocide is likely going to end up in a worse situation genocide wise, which also is supporting genocide.

Realistically speaking so close to the elections you only have two choices: a party whose every member will very happily support Israel and whose core voters won't give a damn about it or another whose a mixed bag in terms of caring about genocide and who also has many voters who are concerned about support to Israel.

so late into the elections it will only increase chances of Trump winning and will not convince her to change stance.

the risk of this is that you move even further away from your goals, practically to a place where it is impossible to do anything about genocide (since core supporters of Trump wont give a shit about and Trump himself for sure will be where money and strongest lobbies are).

this plan only makes sense if your perspective is "by diverting votes we let Trump win, everything goes to hell and then there is some sort of reform/revolution after he fucks up everything". But given that maybe %30 of the country is still big time Trump supporters, we are likely looking at a civil war in that case.

"barely winning" is a dangerous game to play when the consequences of losing is getting much much much further away from your stated goals. if anything it is impossible to push Trump to an anti weapon sale stance (since his core supporters don't care and Trump is where money and strongest lobbies will be) than Kamala whose core supporters actually care but are turning the other way for now due to the fear of losing to Trump.

catculations? greebles?

The mathematician is probably feeling fine because he is computing the conditional probability of survival (otherwise fuck no I am not taking a surgery that has a %50 chance of killing me, that is way too much).

it is more like genocide vs genocide + whole bunch of other human rights violations.

if you are not planning to overthrow the government by revolution then there is no way to go from these two options to an "ideologically perfect" (whatever that means) government in just one election cycle, needs to be done in smaller steps.

wait they did not ask for 10 years experience in the field?

but think of the shareholders who indirectly caused this hurricane!