After using Silverblue for some time I tried to use Arch again, and pacman had failed at installation process. A easy fix for that is to be like: 1. Get list of all the installed packages; 2. Install all these packages again with --force. But after using immutables the situation is just meh.
And also now I dislike package managers which require to be used with sudo, and cannot ask for permissions with polkit.
So. BTW, I don't use Arch.
Do not use Apple products. -> Problem solved.
Seems that you cannot access flathub.org for some reasons, a networking issue probably.
Fedora is Fedora and uBlue is uBlue, a separate project. Blaming Fedora for uBlue issues is like blaming Ubuntu for Mint issues.
And on Silverblue issues on updated happen from time to time. On immutable distros such issues won't break the system unrecoverable, this is the whole reason for immutables, but there are no promises for lacking of issues.
And you are disappointed because you have encountered two different issues at once. But it is a purely random event, and I have not noticed any changes in frequency.
But saying about Silverblue, I think probably it doesn't get much attention from the Fedora project lately, because few recent releases didn't have any improvements either.
Oh, I must post it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dzj-DKG8-k
Translation: https://vocaloidlyrics.fandom.com/wiki/%E3%83%9F%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88_(Mint)
Fedora Silverblue, but OK, well, maybe openSUSE Aeon also.
openSUS
Flatpak haters hate new apps anyway.
Net-zero in 2030 is a lie. Google, Microsoft, whoever, - doesn't matter. It's only five years left. I don't even think that bigcop can go from increasing carbon emissions to decreasing before 2030.
I will use it. I don't care what others think. People can use su, sudo, doas, run0 by their choice, and I don't see why we need a common opinion about it.
Only 101?