(-3)^2 = 9 as well

Didn't they already support all addons a few years ago, and then limited it to the hand-picked ones?

Plusy są chyba ze wszystkich instancji lemmiego

Człowiek nie ma pojęcia jak niedostosowany do niepełnosprawnych jest świat dopóki nie musi z wózkiem pojechać na drugi koniec miasta. Tu winda nie działa i trzeba schodzić z wózkiem po schodach, gdzie indziej winda działa... ale jest ona po kilku schodach o stopniach tak wysokich, że wózek trzeba dosłownie wnieść. Potem się okazuje że w budynku jest drewniana winda z wejściem zbyt wąskim na wózek...

No nie. Jest to ewidentne wprowadzenie w błąd, a proceder taki powinien być jak najszybciej ukarany by nikomu do głowy nie przyszło naciągać dalej tej struny.

This kind of shit is what made me switch to Linux. I just didn't feel like I owned my computer anymore.

Home to all things “Mildly Infuriating” Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined.

~~ Literally the community description

I'm not saying "this place has no place on lemmy", I'm saying this is not the sub for that.

Dołączyłem na tę grupkę, jakoś milej się robi na sercu 🥰 starsi ludzie chwalący się kwiatami, ciastami, czy jaką marchewkę wyhodowali - wspaniałe miejsce 🥰🥰

Yeah, sure, it's always the same story:

1. Chrome adds a shitty anti-user "feature"
2. Firefox users say "no come to firefox we don't have that!"
3. 3 months pass
4. Firefox adds the same "feature" because it's the standard now!!

I'm a Firefox user myself but I really hope something new comes along that actually cares about its users

Absolutely not, science has a long history of ignoring and laughing at many new theories. Many of them were later found out to be true, sure, but it's not like religion doesn't change, reinterpret itself etc. along with the changing times.

All the while nowadays pendulum has swinged to the other side, and most of published papers are never peer-reviewed, as "science" working under a capitalist system must abide by its rules, and so quantity and shock value is more important than quality.

So while in theory "being wrong" sounds like something that would be useful for science in practice, no, it always was about being (or at least seeming) right.