Sure, but for Russia it's the actual doctrine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_military_deception
Cred că în privința comunității românești vorbim despre lipsa de subiecte de discuție pe Lemmy, care duce la lipsa adoptării, care duce la lipsă de subiecte de discuție și tot așa. Este problema tuturor alternativelor la social media și cred că singura soluție este creșterea înceată a comunității (în fond, așa a crescut și Reddit).
Dacă vorbim despre Lemmy in general, cred că problema ține și de felul majorității de a fi și de subiectele aduse în discuție. Trebuie să recunosc faptul că foarte des se aduc anumite subiecte în discuție care nu pasionează neapărat publicul larg. Nici mie nu-mi place capitalismul, dar chiar nu e necesar să discutăm despre asta în fiecare thread, indiferent despre ce e threadul. De asemenea, nu pare că e posibil să ai o părere mai puțin radicală despre acest subiect. Iarăși, nici mie nu-mi place turbo capitalismul, dar nu cred că niște comunism este alternativa.
Chiar și în comunitățile tehnice apare un soi de extremism în discurs. Sunt și eu foarte fan open source, chiar îmi câștig pâinea din asta, dar asta nu înseamnă ca absolut tot ce e closed source e rău. La fel, nu sunt adeptul celor mai noi tehnologii apărute doar de dragul de-a fi mai cu moț.
tl;dr În România e comunitatea mult prea mică pentru a fi adoptată în forma curentă, iar în general hivemind-ul Lemmy e prea radical pentru mulți.
you're a rock star
The top level management: CEO, CFO, CTO etc. Basically, the big bosses.
What mistakes? They got rich with No Mans Sky.
I would say polenta (mămăligă in Romanian) is the easiest to prepare - https://www.chefspencil.com/traditional-romanian-polenta-mamaliga/
It's not a meal by itself, but it's delicious with telemea cheese (you won't find any outside of Romania, can probably be substituted by feta cheese best), sour cream and a fried egg on top. Add a smoked sausage and you got a feast :)
You make a lot of good points, but I have to disagree on the "don't let the user see or touch anything". That's very much not the way immutable distros behave (and I speak mostly about Fedora Silverblue here, I don't have experience with other immutable systems): you can touch and change anything and often times you have mechanisms put in place by the distro developers to do exactly that. It's just that the way you make changes is very different from classical distros, that's all, but you can definitely customize and change whatever you want. I feel the comparison between immutable distros and Apple is really far off: Apple actively prevents users from making changes, while immutable Linux is the opposite -- while there may be some technical limitations, the devs try to empower the user as much as possible.
Although from a purely scientific stand point you are correct and there is no truly random number generator, I would argue that simulating a dice in a video game can be considered random for all intents and purposes.
I don't think Red Hat is violating GPL. For sure it's not violating the legal terms of it (I'm fairly certain the army of lawyers RH and IBM have at their beck and call made sure of that) and I don't think it's violating it's spirit (at least not yet) -- they are still contributing any changes and their customers still get access to the source code. And (for now!) it doesn't even seem they are making it super difficult to do so either. The way I see it, RH wants to be the only game in town providing service contracts for their own product which is fair game, imho. The problem with Rocky is that they also stand to make money out of the same source code which is the disingenuous part, in my opinion.
I honestly don't know why Rocky made this announcement, even if their intentions are noble, they do come out as the bad guys in all this mess. They could have simply put out some generic announcement that "we are working towards a legal way" and kept doing what they are doing.
And to be clear: I believe the true people that stand to lose in this are the users and the community. I've been a user of CentOS (the old style, not this new breed of RHEL beta) for a long time and even an occasional Rocky user in recent times, but that will have to change.
Well, Red Hat doesn't really get paid (of course, I'm not arguing RH is not making or doesn't have enough money) -- they would get payed for one or a very small number of licenses. At the same time, Rocky (and Alma and more importantly Oracle) wants to actually sell (albeit only support) the same product put together by Red Hat so it's not really a community RHEL clone. I think that's the real issue here. I wouldn't have a problem with this workaround if it were coming from the community, without the commercial asterisk attached.
Would Microsoft say...it just works? :D
This article reads like a press release from SUSE.