laurelraven

joined 2 years ago
[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If they were apathetic they wouldn't fight so hard to prevent a single red cent being used to help people

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought they didn't block political figures... Guess the muskrat just meant the figures he agrees with...

Well, you did just describe my experience with diet Pepsi pretty well...

Probably more because of how easy it is to drink than raw strength... It's way easier to put away a bunch of 70 proof sweetened liqueur than the same amount of alcohol worth of 80+ proof hard liquor, very easy to not realize how much you've had until way too late

I'm pretty sure that's regular Coke zero, unless they've changed the packaging again

But yeah, something about the artificial sweetener just doesn't work with alcohol

Thank you for saving me from wasting my time on that slop

I would love to have that level of optimism again... Here's hoping it actually works out that way

And then Biff Tannen was elected US president

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's the modern day book burning

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago

Let's see if it actually plays out that way in practice

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That statement could be applied to a lot of things he's done and gotten away with so far so forgive me if that fails to give me hope

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago

Last I heard was a couple weeks ago them stating clearly that they would not comply, and doing a bit of searching I can't find anything more recent that contradicts that stance... Where did you see that they'd reversed that decision?

view more: next ›