lectricleopard

He could have said nothing. He chose to look bad instead. I think there's a BO smelling fedora around here somewhere...

Fkn wild. How are we such a dopamine addicted nation that this side show seems acceptable to some of the population?

He'll buy a company that does work in a related field. Or perhaps neural link will suddenly become more active in other organs, and he'll dump money into that.

The neural link idea is that he'll eventually not need a body anyway. It's a transhumanism thing. Have fun with that rabbit hole.

Having things be unprovable in a body of models would make it not a 100% correct body of models. You know it'd be... incomplete. That's what it means, we've mathematically proven you cannot prove everything that is true.

NFLS is about whether a particular claim is testable, and can therefore productively be debated (as in I'm not debating whether there is a teapot orbiting earth). The way you've attempted to combine these two ideas is odd.

And by Godel's Incompleteness theorems, that body of models can never be 100% correct.

This was my first thought, we aren't going to develop the whole world. That's not how this works. Who said that was a goal of... well ... anyone's?

That's a rhetorical question. Frfr tho, does that remind me work on your instance only, or what's the deal with that?

I'd consider this moderately restrained on the capslock for a true patriot like we have here.

I'm gonna hazard a guess that you are right about the trend, give or take on the time. However, there will be someone that claims some authority on what is and isn't accurate.

Its been the job of journalists up until now, but this how they'll finally supplant all of news media with their own (a golden Trump head of truth next to the post means grok has looked it over and says its real).

That or an open-source tool will be developed to detect ai media, and we are able to run it locally to confirm. This is my preferred outcome. Maybe I need to start doing some reading.

I've been party to similar conversations where the man I was talking to literally grabbed his crotch in response to a similar question. He really thought genital examination of children was acceptable.

I turned and walked away. You cannot reach some people. We must simply guard ourselves against them.

Yeah, I giggle when I people talk about rtfm like they're tech gods.

Anything I need to know for my job - It's in the source code.

I think where we may differ in opinion is where the power lies in this situation. To me, it's all about having the money for the compute, which means its propaganda for the wealthy. That's nothing new. I do not expect a significant increase in societal support for these types of messages. At least not on a historical scale.

You seem to imply the LLM can at the very least have an emergent agenda, or seeming agenda, of its own. I do not believe that to be the case. LLMs that generate output that doesn't align with the monied interests will be considered misaligned and discarded.

You're missing my point. An LLM can't be "smarter" or "smart" at all. It isn't sentient or conscious. It doesn't even have a stable internal model of the world. What people call "hallucinations" are simply the random words selected at the edges of its convincing predictive power. Personification of LLMs is all marketing. They're really just well presented statistical models.