
lime
this is going to be a super obscure one.
so there's this popular swedish movie franchise that started out as an adoption of a danish movie franchise, but blew through all of their scripts and outgrew it after just three films. it's about a trio of thieves who try to steal high-stakes targets by means of ludicrous plans[^1] but usually fail due to sheer incompetency, only to then have the treasure land in their lap by sheer luck at the end. and in the late 90's, when macromedia shockwave was the big thing, a couple of shockwave-based point-and-click adventures were released with the trio as protagonists. each character has their own special skill, and you need to switch between them to use them. a fun premise, and a fitting one.
the problems start almost immediately. the first puzzle in the game is to blow up a door using dynamite, and at your home base you have five different bags of dynamite to choose from, from one to five sticks. if you pick three, you get through the door. if you take any more, you blow the whole wall out and the police are immediately alerted. game over. if you pick less, you make too much noise and the police are immediately alerted. game over. and if you pick them all up and select the right one, the rest stay in your inventory for the entire game. the inventory is a bar at the bottom of the screen you have to scroll from left to right, and there's so many junk items to pick up that you can easily spend minutes searching for every puzzle. and you don't know what items are junk without playing because while the heist and the items needed for it is planned out beforehand, getting those items always involves hilarious hi-jinks and inventory puzzles. and then the actual heists involve hilarious hi-jinks, inventory puzzles, and extremely exact timing. in a game running on shockwave. at something like five frames per second.
my family gathered around the pc and managed to get through it after many gruelling nights, but only because my mum repeatedly flirted with the studio's it support guy over the phone so he would give us hints.
[^1]: ::: spoiler like for example there's this one heist where a unique diamond necklace is being transported through stockholm in an armored van for display at a high-security museum, and they decide to intercept it en-route. for this they acquire 100 helium balloons, a big bone, a tiny dog, a flagpole, and a sandwich. guy 1 and his kid use the big bone to lure away a guard dog at the marina while the guard is distracted, then replace the guard dog with the tiny dog so the guard faints when he looks at it. the kid then sneaks into the marina to steal a dinghy, and together they mount the flagpole on it so it has a really tall mast. meanwhile guy 2 and 3 hide on a bus to its end stop, where there's usually a bathroom for the driver. when the driver goes in, they steal the bus but leave the sandwich so he has something to eat before calling it in. guy 1 runs up onto the roof of a nearby building to look for the van. when he sees the van approach a lifting bridge, he releases the balloons as a signal to the others. the kid approaches the lifting bridge in the dinghy with the really tall mast so it has to open. while the armored van is stopped at the bridge, guy 2 drives up next to it in the bus and opens the back door, where guy 3 picks the lock, climbs in, and starts putting the diamonds in his bag. but because guy 3 is a pompous ass, he stops a bit longer to pick up some champagne that's also in the armored van for some reason. at this exact moment the bridge closes the van starts moving with him inside. luckily guy 2 manages to also open the front door of the bus exactly as guy 3 steps out. victory! ...and then guy 1's wife gives the bag with the diamonds in it to charity because it's old and ugly and she didn't look inside and they're gonna be rich because of the diamonds anyway so who wants an old, ugly bag. women!
heck yeah, get your kicks wherever you can girl :)
i think they're talking about a leader snatching up power to make themselves an all-powerful ruler. where the power comes not from a mandate of the masses but from ~~a wet tart throwing a sword at you~~ absolute authority.
i do the same thing! that's not disappointing at all, i totally get it. i run and tweak local diffusion models and compressed llms because i want to see how i can bend and break them, and how they react to out-of-set data. i never share any outputs because that's not the interesting part. the purpose is learning! that's a great purpose!
my bosses were the same as your lecturers. for the christmas party last year they made an ai image of themselves as gingerbread men and the result was truly horrifying. they also sent like weekly chatgpt-generated motivational poems in the company newsletter. thank god i am not at that place anymore, some people are waaaaay to into this stuff.
i think the reason you might not have noticed is because we got off on the wrong foot the first few interactions :( the first few times i saw you comment i couldn't really read your way of writing because of esl brain. when i mentioned that, it seemed to make you sad and i felt really bad about it... then it turned out i have one of those mobile clients that don't do display names so i got your name wrong and i felt really bad about that too... but i have you tagged now and i read everything you post and i love your takes on things and the energy you bring. also also, even though i know it wasn't fun for you i really must thank you for your writing changes, it makes it a lot easier for me to follow. i hope you can still get an outlet for that somewhere :(
thanks rocz
im not zitrone, i'm lime! i've been here a while.
and no, it's a great post! makes you think about stuff, like most things you do! i see how you could have taken it that way though, sorry about that.
i was trying to say that the human intention behind something is what really matters, regardless of the tools used. i know you've dabbled in llms before, and i think that's fine as long as it's with a purpose. my main definition of slop is things that are made without a purpose, like just filling websites with text or corporote placeholder art. even the worst quality human-made thing imaginable is better than that because someone wanted to make it.
yeah but you've been away for like two days
the meta has shifted
i really like the word brainmade. because yeah, just because a human made it doesn't mean it's good. but if they had an idea, and they created something from it, no matter how, that's still worth something.
also hiii maria :3
no im sweedish
it shut down because it's not needed anymore.
wait, are black people more radiation-resistant?