i love all these little diorama creators that have popped up recently, they make it very easy to create a city that looks good. But they only hold my interest for so long. i'm looking for something with more meat on it. Any recommendations?
as an example, i remember the first time i managed to keep a city of over a million people going in Sim City 4. at this point money was tight, so the building aspect took a back seat to actually managing the city. balancing the budget, fixing congestion, and so on. it was great fun and a very different challenge than i thought i was in for.
most citybuilders these days seem more focused on the building than the older ones. for example, when i got to the point in Cities Skylines where i thought i was entering the "management" phase, i unlocked a building that just removed an aspect of the game. it was like the game thought that planning the electric grid or schools was a chore that got in the way of building a city, and as a reward it removed those chores.
basically, i'm looking for a game where rather than physically growing the city through placing individual buildings, i help the city grow. like transport tycoon, except the city is the focus rather than the interconnections.
a key part of this, i think, is time. a city that is frozen in time and where clicking with a tool just builds things, like C:S or SC2013, doesn't make for interesting growth. a city designed around historical limitations feels more like something that needs to be managed. a game where buildings and roads take time to complete and modify requires more forethought.
workers and resources comes pretty close but the central planning aspect means that i still need to micromanage the buildings. if it was all about zoning, with special buildings being unlocked by the request system in older sim cities ("x seeks permission to build a stink generator downwind of your residential area") i would enjoy it more.
no.
the discoverer, humphry davy, was english. the name is originally the english "alum" and the latin "ium", which was criticized because names were traditionally constructed from latin roots. european scientists suggested "aluminium", for "element created from alum", but the year after that, when davy published a chemistry book, he spelled it "aluminum". this took hold in britain, but the rest of europe used "aluminium" so they standardized.
a few years later, when the word first appeared in an american dictionary, only the "num" spelling was added. scientists kept using "-ium" but the general populace went on the dictionary definition until it won out. the "american" spelling was only accepted by american scientists about 110 years after the element was discovered.