I have lost any and all respect for Elsevier in particular after that whole AI debacle.

This is horrifying, thanks.

Cuddy's one weakness...Na+/K+ ATPase!

It is astounding to me that this happened. A complete failure of peer review, of the editors, and OF COURSE of the authors. Just absolutely bonkers that this made it to publication. Completely clown shoes.

The key is to do it manually. Reject modernity. Embrace reinvention of not just the wheel.

There is in no way sufficient evidence in this study to draw this conclusion. This study was in no way designed to provide causal evidence. At best, what we can say is that the people who tend to take sildenafil also are less likely to have alzheimers. It could very well be that the people who take sildenafil are more active, and that activity level staves off alzheimers. Or any number of other third variables. This is not as big a deal as the article is making it out to be. Spurious correlations happen all the time, and it behooves us to be measured in our excitement.

Holy confounders, batman, that article sure does make a big logical leap with insufficient evidence!

Where's the "surely if I do ANOTHER postdoc I'll be a better applicant for a TT position..."

I don't think my family has ever been excited about one of my papers, but my whole extended family turned up to my thesis defense. Nearly overwhelming.

Is the VGA port on your dGPU or iGPU? I know Fedora uses Wayland by default -- are you using wayland or X.org on elementary?

VLC to the rescue!

I wonder what was in the sky that someone didn't want seen. Or if people are just dicks.