[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Should anyone be able to say boldfaced lies, reinforced through coordinated efforts with co-conspirators, both real and fake, at such a rapid pace that the value of speech is reduced to nothing?

If no, how do we fix this issue of coordinated, high velocity misinformation?

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

One data point doesn't make a standard.

In general, most CrossFit coaches were well intentioned, but cared more about a rapid pace through reps, rather than the safety of the members.

Weightlifting in CrossFit is better understood as a subtly different exercise. Traditional Weightlifting is a maximum effort exercise, and purely by human physiological limits it has to be modified for CrossFit. If sub-max effort shortcuts were taught, and technical qualification requirements were mandated, the injury rate would be greatly reduced.

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I was lucky to learn Olympic Weightlifting in the 90s from a world class coach, but that was just because I was in the right place at the right time.

I'm thankful for the exposure CrossFit brought to the sport, because there's lifting platforms everywhere now. However, most CrossFit coaches are horrible in regard to providing necessary technique instruction to avoid injury.

One small example that frequently results in injury: you do not "catch" the bar when performing a clean on the palms of your hands. You catch the bar across your deltoids and clavicle.

At a CrossFit gym where I weightlifted for 3 years, I knew of five people needing surgery to repair damage to their wrists from catching a clean improperly on the palms of their hands. They could have just been taught proper technique from the start, but most CrossFit gyms are more concerned with pushing you to your limit immediately, not with finding your long-term potential and avoiding injury.

Hopefully it's improved, but based on the rapid downward popularity trend, I'd assume they have killed off participants through attrition.

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago

Because fascism.

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago

At their core, many are just bullies and it nicely appeals to the emotionally stunted desires of their base.

I recently watched a Nazi documentary on Netflix, and the parallels beyond concerning. If Trump is elected, you should expect Brown Shirt like violence.

For those who think my statement is alarmist, it takes time for fascist propaganda to build inertia, and we're somewhere in the middle of the progression. If you're paying attention, you can see and hear the rhetoric getting more violent. They are following a similar playbook to the Nazis by stimulating the rural communities with more and more nationalist rhetoric.

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 79 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The wholly predictable outcome of poorly regulating capitalism.

"The market will create competition and the best products." No. The market will seek the optimal method to make the most money, and if that optimal method includes killing people, that will be the method selected.

Start putting people in jail and taking businesses into receivership for bad behavior, and then the optional method for maximizing profit will also result in better products.

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 70 points 4 months ago

The anti-trust pressure has increased with this administration. Lina Kahn has been effective at the FTC in bringing a number of cases forward.

https://www.thebignewsletter.com/ is a very well executed newsletter with more detailed information regarding anti-trust if you're interested.

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 172 points 6 months ago

Let's see, in the 80s we rapidly moved much of our technology manufacturing to China, and now we're shocked that China has this knowledge?

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 56 points 7 months ago

Calculated, strategic, opportunistic genocide.

They know in a divided world, where news is delivered through social media, they can control enough of the messaging to get away with it.

Israelis, know that those of us with enough knowledge and emotional intelligence to make reasonable assessments, will forever hold Israel responsible for these atrocities.

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 60 points 9 months ago

Yes you can, that is the definition of what a trademark is.

Could you imagine 20 different brands of Coke on the shelf?

The usage is specific to a market, however. For example, Delta Airlines and Delta Faucets. Both trademark "Delta."

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago

Lots of folks here with strong opinions that have never dealt with legal proceedings, or an itemized bill calculated in 6-minute increments.

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

Isn't that convenient?

view more: next ›

madeinthebackseat

joined 1 year ago