That sounds as likely as any other crazy uninformed reason the Trump team might have.
I do recommend watching those and other government pages because I'm sure this is not the end of the weird edits.
memfree
joined 2 years ago
These attacks do not have to be reliable to be successful. They only need to work often enough to be cost-effective, and the cost of LLM text generation is cheap and falling. Their sophistication will rise. Link-spam will be augmented by personal posts, images, video, and more subtle, influencer-style recommendations—“Oh my god, you guys, this new electro plug is incredible.” Networks of bots will positively interact with one another, throwing up chaff for moderators. I would not at all be surprised for LLM spambots to contest moderation decisions via email.
I don’t know how to run a community forum in this future. I do not have the time or emotional energy to screen out regular attacks by Large Language Models, with the knowledge that making the wrong decision costs a real human being their connection to a niche community.
Ouch. I'd never want to tell someone 'Denied. I think you're a bot.' -- but I really hate the number of bots already out there. I was fine with the occasional bots that would provide a wiki-link and even the ones who would reply to movie quotes with their own quotes. Those were obvious and you could easily opt to ignore/hide their accounts. As the article states, the particular bot here was also easy to spot once they got in the door, but the initial contact could easily have been human and we can expect bots to continuously seem human as AI improves.
Bots are already driving policy decisions in government by promoting/demoting particular posts and writing their own comments that can redirect conversations. They make it look like there is broad consensus for the views they're paid to promote, and at least some people will take that as a sign that the view is a valid option (ad populum).
Sometimes it feels like the internet is a crowd of bots all shouting at one another and stifling the humans trying to get a word in. The tricky part is that I WANT actual unpaid humans to tell me what they actually: like/hate/do/avoid. I WANT to hear actual stories from real humans. I don't want to find out the 'Am I the A-hole?' story getting everyone so worked up was an 'AI-hole' experiment in manipulating emotions.
I wish I could offer some means to successfully determine human vs. generated content, but the only solutions I've come up with require revealing real-world identities to sites, and that feels as awful as having bots. Otherwise, I imagine that identifying bots will be an ever escalating war akin to Search Engine Optimization wars.
If youhave water and a cookpot setup, there's stuff like this:
- https://www.harmonyhousefoods.com/TRAIL-READY-Gourmet-Soup-Chili-Pack-18-ct_p_2058.html
- https://outdoorherbivore.com/5-day-backpacking-meal-combo-gf-vegan/
Edit: here's a site that reviewed such insta meals: https://gearjunkie.com/outdoor/backpacking/best-vegan-backpacking-meals
I'm used to seeing heaping plates of grilled veggies drizzled with olive oil in so many restaurants in Italy that I'd have thought it among the easiest countries to get vegan food, but here's a list of prep steps for future travel.
-
Never expect translations. Unless the government has invited you explicitly, consider yourself an uninvited guest who ought to be thankful for any courtesy.
-
Try to get a phone that can get service where you will be. This can be tricky. If you can't do that, but you CAN get an internet connection at least some of the time (in hotels, for example) consider bringing a laptop. If that is too bulky, then at the very least pre-translate some phrases you expect to need and take screenshots on your no-signal phone or transcribe onto 3x5 cards you can hand people with full text of both languages on each card (either all on one side or English on the back). Example: I would like vegetables and pasta, but no meat, no eggs, no cheese, and no dairy.
-
Make sure you have an adapter that plugs in to their electric outlets.
-
Learn at least a few key words/phrases: "I'm, ummm... Sono vegano... umm, uhh, ... no carne, no latte, no formaggio, no frutti di mare. They may ask something like, "Mangi le uova?" and hopefully you can figure out with hand gestures that they mean 'eggs'.
-
When you find portable food/snacks, buy some extra in advance so you have a backup.
-
Learn to cook so you know what ingredients go into different foods. Example: Tuscan bread is just flour, water, and yeast. The rest of Italy usually adds some salt. In contrast, biscotti has eggs.
In Italy, vegan options are most likely found in meals sections: Primi, Contorni, and Insalata -- you aren't likely to find vegan options in Antipasti, Secondi, nor (obviously) Formaggi e frutta.
From the article:
The Supreme Court ruled last week that Trump can continue to break the law — both US and international law — by having his secret police agents snatch people off American streets, “disappear” them into immigration prisons, then deport them to foreign concentration camps.
Lacking national injunctions, this cruel and inhumane process can now only be stopped one person at a time, one court at a time, at least until the six Republicans on the Court get around to deciding a person’s fate. And they’re now on vacation until October.
As Himmler himself wrote:
“The Führer is of the opinion that in such cases penal servitude or even a hard labor sentence for life will be regarded as a sign of weakness. An effective and lasting deterrent can be achieved only by the death penalty or by taking measures which will leave the family and the population uncertain as to the fate of the offender. Deportation … serves this purpose.”
Field Marshall Keitel was equally enthusiastic, writing:
“Efficient and enduring intimidation can only be achieved either by capital punishment or by measures by which the relatives of the criminals do not know the fate of the criminal. The prisoners are, in future, to be transported … secretly, and further treatment of the offenders will take place here; these measures will have a deterrent effect because: A. The prisoners will vanish without a trace. B. No information may be given as to their whereabouts or their fate.”
Reports from civil rights groups and journalists have documented instances where individuals were taken off the streets or from their homes without warning, transferred out of state, and left incommunicado from legal counsel or family for extended periods. These actions were not isolated errors: they are deliberate strategies aimed at instilling fear across immigrant communities, particularly those made up of Black and brown people.
What makes this moment even more alarming is the Supreme Court’s recent ruling that strips lower courts of the authority to halt deportations or removals, no matter how unlawful or abusive. With judicial oversight diminished, there is a clear and present danger that enforcement powers could be used arbitrarily and punitively.
The use of fear — rather than law — as a governing principle corrodes the foundation of due process and equal protection under the Constitution. Nonetheless, Border Czar Tom Holman bragged:
“Illegal immigrants should be afraid.”
It ends with a call to contact your Senators and Representatives -- and obviously to vote for people who are against all this. The more courageous might also choose film and report any activity that looks ICE-like, but there are heavy risks to that and the article did not suggest it. Instead, they more obliquely suggest:
Support organizations on the ground providing legal aid and sanctuary. Show up at protests, city council meetings, and community gatherings to bear witness and push back.
I heard several sound bites with officials saying, 'No one could have predicted this' and I keep thinking, "I betcha some groundwater geological engineer already predicted this exact disaster complete with amount of rain needed per each foot-level of river rise and with a precise measure of their margins of error." I do NOT know that for a fact, but -- having known geological engineers -- it feels like the sort of thing they'd calculate out of idle curiosity (especially if they notice new development diverting groundwater in unmitigated ways).
I see a muscovy mama's wing. Are they all hers or do other girls lay eggs in her nest? Lots of different colors in that set.
ptarmigan
The article talks about anthropomorphism the way people did in the 1950s by treating it as humans falsely attributing human behaviors to animals without bringing up research since then that suggests we share a whole lot of traits.
From a simple mechanical point of view, animals limp when injured, scratch when itchy, sleep when tired, yawn, stretch, eat, sneeze, and so on from the same sorts of triggers that trigger us.
Moreover, does anyone really think humans evolved emotions entirely separate from animals? Do animals not experience fear, lust, aggression, frustration, and so on in ways similar to us? And often for similar abstracted reasons (I'm not going to fight you specifically for a a piece of bloated carrion, but we've seen people storm the Aid trucks bringing food to the hungry).
Obviously, humans misinterpret animal behavior all the time and THAT is legitimate anthropomorphism. There's a meme of a duck 'laughing' that anyone who studied duck behavior would recognize as a distressed animal. Don't smile at monkeys because showing teeth is a threat and if they show THEIR teeth to you, back off. People get stuff wrong all the time, and anthropomorphize frequently, but so much of what animals do is the same as us that the mistakes are understandable.
Instead of saying that people anthropomorphize parent animals licking/grooming their offspring as 'a mom's love', I think it more appropriate to say people recognize a common trait we share. The scientist may term it as a bonding ritual, a need for cleanliness to ward off disease, and/or a method to identify their offspring's scent and shape, BUT you could say the same thing about human moms (though we aren't very good at scent and usually lick a napkin to get the smudge off rather than directly licking the child). We're mostly the same. The attributions are often correct.
11
Astronomers Have Found the Home Address for Universe's "Missing" Matter | Newswise
(www.newswise.com)
Link is part of a live feed. Here's more:
DHS claims Padilla 'lunged' toward Noem 'without identifying himself' – despite footage showing he identified himself
Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary for the Department of Homeland Security, has claimed the senator Alex Padilla “lunged” toward Kristi Noem during the press conference “without identifying himself” despite being told to back away.
She also claims that the Secret Service “thought he was an attacker”.
In the video footage of the moment, Padilla can be heard clearly identifying himself, saying: “I’m Senator Alex Padilla” and trying to ask Noem a question.
Not only did he identify himself, I didn't see anything I'd call a 'lunge'. Here's more:
Asked why the response was to forcibly remove Padilla, Noem deferred questions to law enforcement and doubled down on the claim that Padilla didn’t identify himself first (again, he did):
- "But I will say that it’s – people need to identify themselves before they start lunging at people during press conferences."
MSNBC reminds us of Biden's State of the Union when Bobert and Marjorie Taylor Greene started acting up and yelling and no one threw them out. Commentor wants to know why Noem didn't call off the guards as soon as he identified himself.
Deep in the entrails of the framework, the databases have been glitching: incorrectly issuing penalties and wrongly moving recipients into the Kafkaesque “penalty zone”. The bug was falsely cancelling welfare benefits to thousands of recipients across many years.
That's a really critical bug. QA is supposed to catch this sort of thing. Development is supposed to fix it, and fast. When the client is a government, it should have the foresight to put in the contract that it will withhold payments until such critical bugs are fixed. If you don't do that, why would the vendor bother with QA and bug fixes?
And all of that is aside the fact that the whole thing results in busy work, hoop-jumping, and wasting time for both the people administrating it and those trying to get benefits. Sheesh.
38
'4chan come to life': How Fox News, CNN, Taylor Swift reacted to wild Trump-Harris debate
(www.azcentral.com)
view more: next ›
Holy moly, that is a good essay. Below are a few bits that resonated with me.
That made me cringe thinking of the current state of the Supreme Court and how they are making true Justice harder to reach.
This called to mind the same author's essay from 2 days earlier (Brock, Ideas Without Love) about Peter Thiel:
Back to this post, two more insights I appreciate:
All this reminds me of the critique on U.S. society that we are no longer "joiners" and now put artificial barriers between ourselves and our neighbors. We don't join the Elks Club or attend Township meetings or have block-party get-togethers where it doesn't matter if it is a mix of Trumpers and Biden-backers, or vegans and beefeaters because everyone is there to get the road fixed or raise money for the library or whatever the cause of the day might be. I am guilty of this failure, too. I am fully aware that online chat is siloed and doesn't count, so I really need to join something. I just wish my body wasn't giving me mobility issues that make the task so hard.