menas

joined 2 years ago
[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 0 points 1 year ago

menas

If there were 49% of "to radical leftist" in France, we sure do not need election to proclaim socialism. Most of us are not enough politicized to criticized them as a political line. Still we couldn't convince people by ignoring their feeling when their are legit, even if those feelings may leads to actions that seems against our common interests.

If we claim equality, we shall listen before speaking.

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The most "anti-fascist" parliament group (LFI) is the same that vote "yes" for spying instant messenger. I did vote; but I couldn't blame people for feeling betrayed by parties. We are, and shall not expect otherwise unless we threat those the same people we send too parliament by direct actions. Organizing on our needs make people vote, but voting do not lead to class based organization

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 10 points 1 year ago

This kind of demonstration took place in a lot of city in france, if not all.

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We shall not confuse data and information. With internet we have access to a lot of data, but information is hard to find. Furthermore information are structured by the institution that made it : university, TV, newspaper, and social network Those dominant institution are not very interested in homelessness or other class struggle in your neighborhood. So relevant information for your social and geographical position is even more rare.

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Undeclared demonstration with call to insurrection, avoiding the cops, and burning outside bin" It's intense for a protest, but lite for a riot ¯\(o_o)/¯

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 year ago

I read the text, and didn't find anything on centralize or decentralize messenger. Are you talking about the technical solution they want to use ? The text is very confusing about it.

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It's a common strategy for the president to nominate it's most dangerous opposant. During the next election, this one could not criticize a government where he was.

However, Macron shouldn't have the right to present himself a third time. Does he get ride of this limitation ? Is it actually a conviction move, to help the far right ? Or is their a greatest interest of his class to get even more authoritarian regimes ?

In any cases, we gently rioting yesterday after this announcement.

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 year ago

We were afraid of totally extermination by AI. Reality is worst and boring, as usual

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 year ago

I do agree, but in case of violence, I'd rather have the control of food, logistics, communication and ammunition by our side. That's a "lesser violence" plan

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes. But General Strike. But Yes

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 year ago

Vote or don't but organize internationally

I'm not from the US, and no, I'm not feeling safer with liberal or not. Imperialism is pretty much the same. I don't know what is worse, but I'm sure that in both cases, it would worthless if you have not a strong anti-imperialist and organized movement inside an international organization.

For example, my organization is in the ICL, like the IWW.

view more: ‹ prev next ›