The "we'll save some bucks by removing physical knobs and pose this as futuristic by making some vital functions only accessible via multiple levels of menus on a touchscreen" thing is the worst and should be banned.
mlen
joined 2 years ago
Technically superman is a more correct translation for that word (similarly to how superscript is the thing beyond the script)
All roads lead down from the local maximum
It's a treasure trove of hilariously bad takes.
There's nothing intrinsically valuable about art requiring a lot of work to be produced. It's better that we can do it with a prompt now in 5 seconds
Now I need some eye bleach. I can't tell anymore if they are trolling or their brains are fully rotten.
Rich Hickey joins the list of people annoyed by the recent Xmas AI mass spam campaign: https://gist.github.com/richhickey/ea94e3741ff0a4e3af55b9fe6287887f
Cory's talk on 39C3 was fucking glorious: https://media.ccc.de/v/39c3-a-post-american-enshittification-resistant-internet
No notes
Digressing: The irony is that it's a language with one of the best standard libraries out there. Wanna run a http reverse proxy with TLS cross compiled for a different os? No problem!
Many times I used it only because of that despite it being a worse language.
It's easy, just more to Signal
What do you mean by decline? Years ago I've been involved in a local ruby community in Poland and even back then his takes were considered unhinged.
Huh, what happened? Would you mind linking some more details?
Depends on how they are used. They are extremely useful when they add context that is otherwise not present in the code, but way too often I see people simply restating what the code does in the comment. That's not very useful and can become confusing if the code later gets updated without updating the associated comment.
view more: next ›
When I do code review these days, sometimes I genuinely can't tell whether I'm talking to the person or to the slop extruder. It often ends up with me repeating the same comment over and over again.