🎶🎵I don't want anybody else. When I think about you I ask an employee for assistance🎵🎶
neatchee
but it's not first-hand testimony. it's a typewritten document by an FBI agent. that is literally not first-hand testimony. in order to be first-hand testimony it needs to be given in a courtroom or recorded. we don't even know if the person who made the phone call is who they claim to be.
As I said, they care about how you think. Do you ask all these questions?
if I were given this interview question I would immediately start asking questions: Do I have my phone? Can I bring any objects into the room? Do I know the construction of the light? How far from the room is the light switch panel?
Asking "what are the limitations and conditions of this situation" is literally the thing they want to see. That's my entire point.
This is a second hand report of the first person's claim. The document itself is hearsay. Her testimony would be admissable. A recording would be admissable. A typewritten document from who the fuck knows when is not.
You don't even have any evidence to suggest they didn't investigate the claim. Do you have any idea how many lunatics file false claims every day? Overwhelming is with time-wasting bullshit sure sounds like a great way to stall for time. I'm not interested in helping mask the real stuff but looking at one-off unsubstantiated reports that any citizen could make.
Show me a single shred of evidence supporting this claim and I'll be with you. But at this point it's a giant fucking waste of time and energy.
I hate that this particular story is being picked up. it's a single report to the FBI from someone decades after it allegedly happened. Literally the best possible example of hearsay
The Epstein docs have so much far more damning evidence that is verifiable. Focusing on what amounts to a single phone call to the FBI - something I could do myself tomorrow - makes us look like bafoons
This is often exactly what the interview question is testing. Many of these questions are not about the solution but about how the applicant approaches problems
Everyone who's ever used a WYSIWYG editor, putting on 90s sunglasses: "We're in!"
But it's so credible! Especially the part about.... Lake Michigan -_- .... Because when I think of Donald Trump I think of the great lakes. Don't you? 🙄
wan wan I'm a weeb
As if the goons in Congress care what HRW has to say
You know, most fun facts aren't that fun. This one? Actually fun!