I take it as people just joking. Personally I'm in doubt if the tweet is serious and the new book is true, or is it just a joke about refactoring/re-writing code.

At this point it is about malicious compliance. Oops I can't have windows anymore.

But you'll at least let us take a smaller or bigger peek right? Don't worry we have a screen recorder ready, you don't have to do anything.

All that because they made a distro based in Ubuntu but got rid of snap? Ok...

Outlook (new new new final)

Hey, shitposts are like manure that helps other posts grow.

cat

Ahhhhh, fuck. I'm quite noob with linux. I got into some rabbit hole trying to read the docs. I found 2 man pages, one is cat(1) and the other cat(1p). Apparently the 1p is for POSIX.

If someone could help me understand... As far as I could understand I would normally be concerned with (1), but what would I need to be doing to be affected by (1p)?

Experimental: 1.1.104

Stable: We are trying to get there some day

I don't like mixing with the cars so anything that is not that. I'd probably wait to reach the end of MUP and take whichever green light is on. Either the left or the front crosswalk. And then wait on the opposite side for the other green light.

Windows hits end of life in 2025 you say? Welp.

I saw the other day a profile full of PRs, all diffs were changes from passing code through an autoformater.

Fearing a bit to say it but Haskell. I know that it is a different concept, but it's not just that for me. The way the elements are separated, sometimes spaces sometimes symbols, makes it hard for me to understand how things are grouped, and what gets plugged into what.