We did some research on Warrenite economy and now we plan to research ancom economy.
Climate catastrophe and burnout and want to get into politics to maximize my impact on the world. Then I searched over most ideologies, finding anarchism the most compatible with critical thinking.
Who know, maybe if we (anarchists and anti-authoritarians) grow in size and power then in the future we (anarchist and anti-authoritarians) may be able to create various initiatives to give "micro-grants" to various creators to give them a chance to create something with possibility to continue the support if the progress and quality is deemed acceptable. For now I imagine this project will be bootstrapped, but crowdsourcing or other avenues of funding are possible if we ever get to a stage of a nice demo or proof of concept.
Thanks for the feedback concerning the linebreaks, I will try to improve that in future posts. And good luck to you with your FOSS projects!
I'm a dirty, smelly barbarian too, hello there!
Yeah, like I am voting to not give fascists slots in the system without the fight, but the truth is that direct organizing is much better to change the system and you can easily fall into the trap of caring too much about electoral politics.
You can fork it, sure Linus is very respected and his decisions are considered very important but you can fork it and change however you want so it's still compatible with Anarchism.
So anarchy - lack of coercive hierarchy is when there is coercive hierarchy? Nope, you are just not especially smart person.
Anarchism is against coercive hierarchies, so not really. Look at Zapatistas or Rojava, they I would say falsify your statement.
You may join local IWW, help with local food not bombs, go to some anarchist bookfair near you etc. About theory, there is a website called the anarchist library with a lot of books concerning anarchism for free!
What do you mean? In anarchism it's more like you try to find people that want to do the similar thing to you and you can all agree to whatever method you want. It can be conensus-seeking, with possible modification to prevent veto or majoritarian or > 90 agree or whatever like that. And overall if people don't want to partake in your action they should be able to leave your group.
Yeah, I think Matrix would be better, but I am fine with it. Maybe you have other suggestions?