Anarchism

4556 readers
1 users here now

Are you an Anarchist? The answer might surprise you!

Rules: 0. Post content that is thoughtful and relevant to social liberation from an anarchist, autonomous, antifascist perspective.

  1. Be respectful
  2. Don't be a nazi
  3. Argue about the point and not the person
  4. This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your “epic dunks on the anarkiddies” is not. As a result of the instance’s poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren’t just looking to start a fight.

See also:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

Hi, I am the new moderator of /c/Anarchism

Feel free to resume posting, following site-wide and community-specific rules.

My personal views won't interfere with moderation, but the above guidelines will be enforced.

I will also try to resonate with the broader community, as described in the sidebar.

That's all. Enjoy your stay.

2
 
 

I'm digging anarchists' more hands on, pragmatic approach to politics. I finished The Conquest of Bread a couple of weeks ago and I'm currently working my way through Bullshit Jobs. Any suggestions about theory, praxis, mutual aid, etc. would be appreciated

3
 
 

gif"s artidote is seeking an antidote to toxicity through art, music, community events, discussion, activism, mutial aid & solidarity.

to that end i have set up a collective.

check it out here, and if you're inspired, come join me!

https://opencollective.com/gifs-artidote

through my personal activities as an artist, blogger, student crim/psy & community activism i am seeking to create a (local & global) community collective to de-toxify human behaviour by starting with my self & encouraging others to do the same.

i live by my motto: change the world, start with your self.

read more on my website's home,- & about pages.

i am working on a manifesto but due to my own limitations that's a work in progress.

i need others' contributions & i am only just starting out so if you like my ideas, come join me & contribute.

i am based in teesside, north yorkshire, england & this initiative is starting in my own local community, but my aim is to create a global network of people who commit to the manifesto we create, debate & maintain together.

i only take the initiative, & set out a basis, but as we grow this #collective, through discussion & debate based on anarchist principles, i hope the collective will take lead & develop independently.

4
1
(social.vivaldi.net)
 
 

@anarchism

Is there anybody there ??

5
 
 

The USA is a brutal imperialist empire. Facist are the useful idiots of empire. Facism is capitalism in crisis and imperialism is its highest form. If you want to know what the USA is up to... both parties by the way... give this a read. Layers on layers... we getting steamrolled... even the useful idiots are gonna get "f"ed in the "a"... Which path to persia?

6
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/48741557

Finally some good fucking news 🏴🏴🏴

7
 
 

#solidarity to my siblings in occupied #TurtleIsland & global colonies, as the so-called u.s.a. has invaded economically, politically & now military too pretty much everywhere.

#organise #educate & #resist in any way you can.

we got your back & fight alongside you everywhere. the #Global99% #antifa #press #media #news #BreakingNews #GlobalDirectAction

✊️🏴🌍🌎☮️🖤

8
 
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/7201207

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/16418

This statement was prepared and signed by member organizations of the Latin American Anarchist Coordination – Coordinación Anarquista LatinoAmerica (CALA). Black Rose/Rosa Negra (BRRN) was invited to sign the statement as a sibling organization.


The Latin American Anarchist Coordination and sibling organizations condemn the threats of direct intervention in Venezuela by the US government, driven by the Trump administration.

These attempts and threats of intervention are not isolated incidents, nor are they a temporary response to alleged problems of “security,” “drug trafficking,” or “terrorism.” On the contrary, they are part of a long history of imperial interference in Latin America and the Caribbean, the effects of which have systematically fallen on the oppressed peoples and classes of the region.

The story is well known: every time the United States has invoked these pretexts, the result has been social devastation, loss of sovereignty, and violence. Panama in 1989, Iraq in 2003, and multiple interventions in our region show that this is not about “defending democracy,” but rather about political, military, and economic control. In the case of Venezuela, these threats come on top of more than a decade of economic blockade that has hit the daily lives of the people hard, deepening shortages, precariousness, and the deterioration of material conditions of existence.

In this respect, it is essential to emphasize that imperialist aggression does not punish ruling elites, but instead falls directly on the popular sectors. Blockades, sanctions, military intimidation, and financial suffocation are not “surgical” tools: they are mechanisms of economic warfare that seek to break the resistance of an entire people, discipline them, and force them to accept a subordinating order.

A recent and striking example of this logic is the act of piracy and blatant theft of a Venezuelan oil tanker by armed US military personnel, which was detained and appropriated under the protection of unilateral sanctions. Beyond the legal technicalities with which Washington attempts to justify these actions, what is evident is an exercise in modern piracy: the use of military, judicial, and financial power to appropriate resources. This is not only an attack on the Venezuelan state, but also a direct aggression against the people, because every shipment seized, every asset retained, and every property confiscated deepens the living conditions imposed by the blockade.

What’s more, their disregard for the lives of the people is evident in the absolute ease with which they launched explosives at fishing boats off the Venezuelan coast, taking away not only those people’s livelihoods, but also their lives and their right to defend themselves against unproven accusations. The massacre was televised and celebrated by those at the top.

These types of actions clearly reveal what the “international order” defended by the United States means today: a system in which major powers arrogate to themselves the right to decide who can trade, who can produce, and who deserves to be punished. International law is selective, flexible for allies, and brutally rigid for those who do not submit. In this context, the seizure of ships, the freezing of assets, and economic sanctions function as weapons of war, even though they are presented as administrative measures.

The recent awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to María Corina Machado follows the same logic of cynicism and double standards. These types of awards do not express universal values, but rather geopolitical alignments. Far from representing a genuine defense of the rights of the Venezuelan people, this recognition operates as a political gesture by imperial powers toward a leader who has openly endorsed sanctions, economic blockades, and threats of intervention. The Venezuelan right wing, far from offering a way out for the working classes, thus presents itself as a necessary partner in a strategy that deepens social suffering and dependence.

The explicit reappearance of the Monroe Doctrine in recent US government documents and statements only confirms this course of action. The old slogan “America for Americans” — that is, for Washington’s interests — is once again being asserted without euphemisms, reinstating the idea of Latin America as a natural zone of domination. This threatens not only Venezuela, but all the peoples of the continent, by legitimizing interventions, economic pressure, coups d’état, and the forced alignment of governments that stray from imperial interests. A prime example of this has been the Trump administration’s unprecedented intervention in Argentina in recent months, specifically in domestic economic policy, the foreign exchange market, and even the electoral process, giving a sudden boost to Milei’s government.

In the current context, the United States is no longer an unchallenged power, but it remains a central player in a world order based on violence, plunder, and imposition. Its growing aggressiveness also reflects its own internal crises and its need to reaffirm its control over strategic territories rich in oil, minerals, water, and biodiversity. Latin America, once again, appears as the spoils and rear guard of an imperial project that remains deeply dangerous.

Defending people’s self-determination—dominated, exploited, and oppressed classes within so-called “national” contexts—does not imply idealizing governments or denying internal contradictions inherent in the Venezuelan process, of which we are critical, but rather rejecting foreign intervention outright and affirming the right of every dominated, exploited, and oppressed class to fight for the improvement of their destiny without threats, blockades, or occupations. In this sense, we affirm that organization in the face of this situation cannot come from above or be delegated to state structures, but can only be built from below, through popular organization and the direct participation of those who sustain daily life under conditions of siege.

The case of the looted ship, like the economic blockade as a whole, shows that imperialism does not seek to “correct” governments, but rather to subjugate entire peoples through hunger, isolation, and collective punishment.

In Venezuela, as in the rest of Latin America, even amid the difficulties caused by bureaucratization, limitations, and tensions with the state that tend to weaken grassroots organization; communes, territorial spaces, and forms of popular organization sustain daily material and social resistance in the face of the blockade, shortages, and imperialist aggression.

Our struggle goes beyond the borders imposed by states and unites us with all oppressed classes. The imperialist government of the North has taken a xenophobic, racist, and persecutory stance toward migrant communities within its territory. The attack on Venezuela is ideologically based on the racism that is inherent in the US state—as in other states—and that radiates internally and externally in favor of the dominant classes of that country.

In the face of this offensive, as anarchists we denounce the US government and maintain that the solution will not come from stronger states or disputes between powers, nor from the so-called international organizations created by and for states, but from the construction of a strong people, organized from below, with political independence and a real capacity to contest power.

The history of Latin America shows that every advance of imperialism has encountered resistance even in adverse conditions. This sustains dignity and the capacity for a collective response. It is the material basis of popular power from below.

In the face of imperialism neutrality is not possible. Either you are on the side of domination, plunder, and war, or you are on the side of the oppressed.

Our commitment is long-term but clear: to strengthen popular organization, deepen resistance, and build from below an emancipatory horizon for the oppressed classes of the world.

Imperialism will not pass!

Long live those who fight!

Coordinación Anarquista Latinoamerica (CALA)

  • Federación Anarquista Uruguaya (FAU) – Uruguay
  • Federación Anarquista Santiago (FAS) – Chile
  • Coordenação Anarquista Brasileira (CAB) – Brazil
  • Federación Anarquista Rosario (FAR) – Argentina
  • Organización Anarquista Resistencia (OAR) – Argentina
  • Organización Anarquista Tucumán (OAT) – Argentina
  • Organización Anarquista Cordoba (OAC) – Argentina
  • Organización Anarquista Santa Cruz (OASC) – Argentina
  • La Tordo Negro – Organización Anarquista Enterriana – Argentina
  • Organización Anarquista Impulso – Argentina

Sibling Organizations

  • Black Rose Anarchist Federation / Federación Anarquista Rosa Negra (BRRN) – USA

The post International Statement: We Denounce the Imperial Offensive on Venezuela appeared first on Black Rose/Rosa Negra Anarchist Federation.


From Black Rose/Rosa Negra Anarchist Federation via This RSS Feed.

9
 
 

🚨Support one half of the Armstrong 2 with their legal fees!🚨 Scan the QR code or go to https://bit.ly/tommie-armstrong2

Tommie is a mental health worker who allegedly took action against #RafaelAdvancedDefenceSystems in May this year with one other comrade, in an action referred to as the '#Armstrong2'. They don't qualify for legal aid, so need your help with fundraising!

Tommie says "As someone working in healthcare, I want to express particular solidarity to #Palestinian healthcare workers (and international colleagues who have travelled to help)- saving lives in a care system intentionally targeted by the #Israeli military. The ongoing imprisonment and torture of many of them horrifies me."

Support them by sharing this post and donating what you can to bit.ly/tommie-armstrong2

https://www.instagram.com/p/DSVWLyIiJDb

#FreePalestine 🇵🇸 #MutualAid #UKfascism

10
 
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/6943504

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/11749

The voice of an anarchist who fled Ukraine to escape mobilization and war thecollective Thu, 12/04/2025 - 15:10

Mainstream media and even some “anarchist” or “radical left” media outlets bombard us with reports about soldiers on the front lines, but stubbornly refuse to listen to the voices of those who reject war and violent mobilization for war purposes. We take a different approach. We prefer to give space to the voices of those who fled the war rather than to hypocrites who describe the war as a liberation struggle.

Viatcheslav is an anarchist who fled mobilization. To quote him: “I refused to join the army and fled at the beginning of the war in 2022. It’s not that I particularly like Putin’s regime; I know very well that he is a dictator and that under his regime I would have no freedom and, as an anarchist, my life would even be in danger. But I have no desire to sacrifice my life so that the Ukrainian bourgeoisie can enjoy their privileges, so that the sons of oligarchs my age can continue to sunbathe on the beaches of Odessa while I tremble with fear in a trench, waiting to be bombed by a drone. War is also a class issue: if you are rich, it is very easy to obtain a medical certificate and be exempted from going to the front. That is not my case. It is not fair. That is why I decided to leave. Here in France, I was not welcomed with open arms.”

From anarchistnews.org - We create the anarchy we want in the world via This RSS Feed.

11
 
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/50796592

I feel like it will always be a work in progress, but I thought it's in a good enough state to share it.

If you have any recommendations for related books/articles/etc. that are worth checking out, and if you have anything to add/change/improve in the document, please let me know :)

12
13
14
15
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/56087695

I'm some good anarchist podcasts to listen to. What would you guys recommend? Big plus if they have an RSS feed link.

16
 
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/29017365

I would like to connect. Maybe discuss direct action opportunities and share literature. If you are not Iraqi and have any information about active iraqi or arabic speaking anarchist communities please share. the anarchist movement is nonexistent in iraq but i know there are individual anarchists afraid of speaking.

17
 
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/6303361

cross-posted from: https://ibbit.at/post/67950

This article by Elio Henríquez originally appeared in the September 29, 2025 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

San Cristóbal de las Casas. The Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN) released images of vehicles belonging to the Mexican Army, the Chiapas Attorney General’s Office, and state and municipal police from Ocosingo “at the service of Huixtán landowners,” who recently seized a “recovered” piece of land from Zapatista bases.

In a two-and-a-half-minute video released Monday night on the official Enlace Zapatista website, titled “Images for the Farmers’ Morning Conference,” footage of Ocosingo municipal police trucks patrolling near the property was first revealed.

Images then appear of a convoy of five units from the prosecutor’s office and the state police. Two trucks carrying Mexican Army personnel are then seen.

Once all the vehicles have passed, the sign reads: “Serving the farmers of Huixtán. Result?” Immediately afterward, a sign appears next to the wire fence of the property reading: “Private property. Huixtán joint ownership. No entry.”

The Assembly of Collectives of Zapatista Autonomous Governments and the Common Governments denounced on Sunday that, with the support of members of the Federal Army, the Ocosingo police, and the State Attorney General’s Office, residents of Huixtán “burned and destroyed houses” belonging to EZLN support bases and took over a property in the town of Belén, Caracol 8, Dolores Hidalgo.

From Mexico Solidarity Media via this RSS feed

EZLN

18
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/54566460

Books, pamphlets, manifestos, you name it/whatever. Please just leave out terminally online "bread"tubers, thank you.

Ideally from a few reputable Anarchist to get a better picture. The literature doesn't have to be exclusively about authority, but should mention it in relative detail.

Edit: Since I rightfully got called out on the following sentence in another thread as being demeaning of online educators work

Please just leave out terminally online "bread"tubers, thank you.

I should maybe clarify that I meant people like Contrapoints who have delightfully little to do with any kind of leftistm, let alone Anarchism

19
20
 
 
21
 
 
22
 
 

Georgia prosecutors are facing what one expert called “probably the highest-profile failure of using conspiracy charges to indict a protest movement” in US history, after a two-year attempt to prosecute a criminal conspiracy in connection with opposition to the police training center known as Cop City.

Fulton county superior court Judge Kevin Farmer announced his decision to dismiss charges against the case’s 61 defendants during hearings this week on a handful of defense attorney motions.

After an hour-plus of discussion in this week’s hearing, Farmer came back from a break and used only 18 words to stymie the state’s prosecution, nearly three years after arrests: “At this time I do not find the attorney general had the authority to bring this Rico case.

23
24
25
view more: next ›