racketlauncher831

Until the new Temporal API comes along, there are some libraries we can use.

• luxon
• dayjs
• or compile chrono (Rust) to WebAssembly

I don't make my bed too, but I swear there is some psychological/ritual shit going on in there. Another example would be why go to the church. Can't we just pray and confess on our own balcony?

Why hang up Christmas lights only to take them down a week later?

Why read when (if) we can inject knowledge into our brain?

Why workout when we can just inject steroids?

Some of there stuff are more of a waste of time than others, and I suspect it is the reason OP has this (un)popular opinion.

I don't. This is how it looks like on my Voyager.

Point is (again), it takes zero effort to cross post a video or article here. Windows is historically having a high market share ratio, and people are migrating to Linux nowadays. That's good news to the Linux world. Even someone merely mentioning ditching Windows has an implication of adopting Linux instead.

But what if more and more posts implying this by only mentioning how bad Windows is? Is this a community for Windows circlejerk, or do we share informative stuff that's directly related to Linux? How about we share more article about how great Linux is (or can be), instead of how bad the competitors are becoming?

What's wrong with going back to pen and (e-)paper for office? My point is, if you are going to post something in the community, the word "linux" shall at least be in the title.

Good title example: Europe is slowly ditching Microsoft for Linux

It's nobody's fucking business when someone ditching Microsoft, then adopt BSD, Solaris whatnot. What matters to this community is someone adopting or ditching Linux, or they do something remotely related to it.

Fair enough. I didn't watch the video.

"Everything they said"? Ha. The OP literally just said "I doubt it" without any reasoning. It sounds to me that they are the ones who reject everything other people said, and blindly believe in their instinct: "Yeah. I don't believe science."

Call it belittling. I probably won't say it out loud, but I absolutely laugh at these kind of people silently, who don't care to take a look at facts and theories.

Pro tip: you can basically... 100... by visiting PornHub... Never mind.

Sorry, sir (or madam), you doubt math? Are you saying you don't even believe mean value has a bigger chance of matching what you expect? Well that's fine.

It sounds like you are doubting something without understanding it. Let's say you gathered all the electricity consumption of individual houses in July in your city. Now, if someone is building a new house next to a regular one, what do you predict how much electricity it will consume? You answer with the mean value of your dataset. It's that simple.

This can count as machine learning.

Now, are you saying you doubt this math, which has been used for probably more than two millennium, or are you doubting something else?

Panel two should really be showing the "windows".

Yo, a bunch of movies and games needed that: God of War (2018) and onwards, The Last of Us Part II to name a few.