You can and should design for change, within reason, because all successful programs will need to change in ways you cannot predict

You've yourself here. You can not predict how it wull change. Which means that whichever design for change you've made, may just as well completely miss the future utilization

Which doesn't mean that we shouldn't design for change at all... Just saying.

I guess it would still be enough for a lifetime 🤷‍♂️

Maybe Slimbook? I haven't bought one yet but it's definitely on my close watch.

https://slimbook.es/en/

The name of the wind.

You have to make it easy on yourself and just use a switch with default true for evens, then handle all the odd numbers in individual cases. There, cut your workload in half.

It also helps if one doesn't try to pronounce German as if it was English 😈

I believe it's using a feature built-in directly in the filesystem.

I'm just curious if it's possible to browse individual snapshots like in MacOS Time Machine and fetch individual files out.

Interesting, instead of acceptance, simply invent another hypothesis to "confirm" the likely uncomfirmable.

I get the "scientific" method of it though.

Deja vu anyone?

As much as I'd love to, they're simply too expensive, by far. Amd I've had several Sony's compact models before that have each left me with a malfunctioning screen after about a year.

In exchange for what?

Raise awareness...