Vessi does the job in typhoon or snow storm. My pair of Weekend finally busted a leak after 4 years of everyday use, but my feet stayed dry. I still use them for mild weather now.
runsmooth
Another idea was perhaps the OP can receive the request for a tag, and be given a set time to accept or decline.
Perhaps the OP could be a bot or may not be too active, and the set time gives them a chance before the community at large have their way?
I'm not sure how that may look in practice.
Perhaps it could be just a 1 to 1 exchange, like a user can just make the proposal to the OP with a quick form.
Or if it turns out the OP is a bot perhaps small poll can be set where a user proposes the tag, and an arbitrary number like 1-2 other votes are needed to accept the tag?
Can users, who are not the original posters, add or propose tags to posts?
Perhaps this can be a way to organize posts in a meaningful way?
I think this sort of open American cronyism is what's destroying the business goodwill any of these US social media platforms ever had, or even have left.
"Deceiving users with blue checkmarks, obscuring information on ads and shutting out researchers have no place online in the EU," said European Commission Vice President Henna Virkkunen.
Pre-empting the announcement on Thursday night, United States Vice President JD Vance that "the EU should be supporting free speech not attacking American companies over garbage."
Virkkunen said the ruling had "nothing to do with censorship," adding: "If you comply with our rules, you don't get a fine. It's as simple as that."
I take this to mean the UCP has, yet again, publicly disarmed Elections Alberta from performing its role.
I also consider that the UCP is publicly trying to disarm the Justice System by preventing the issue and related questions of Alberta independence from being posed to the courts at all.
I'll drop in a new AlbertaUnderSiege tag because this is very much an attack by the UCP on a branch of government - the Judiciary.
When the changes to the Citizen Initiative Act in Bill 14 take effect, Sylvestre will be able to resubmit his application for a referendum proposal.
The legislation removes the requirement that the question can't contravene the Constitution, and only the justice minister — not the chief electoral officer — will have the power to refer proposals to the courts.
And since Kenney's talking, definitely not Elections Alberta when they were looking into election wrongdoing
Certainly not the Ethics Commissioner about Premier Smith, because the formal definitions of Ethics are so narrow that no one can be found unethical and suffer any consequences.
https://globalnews.ca/news/10179935/alberta-ethics-commissioner-hinshaw-contract/
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/alberta-premier-office-emails-prosecutors-coutts-1.6719743
Oh and just for good measure, the UCP will also make sure Professional governing bodies will also define Ethics narrowly with them.
https://globalnews.ca/news/11536277/alberta-regulated-professions-neutrality-act/
We get to define egregious, illegal, and grossly unethical - not you.
"My government purposely set very high thresholds," Kenney said. "Frankly, we replicated the thresholds developed in British Columbia in 1991 under an NDP government to ensure there's a really broad public demand for a byelection.
"We have it as an ultimate tool of accountability if a politician does something absolutely egregious, illegal, grossly unethical."
#EthicalFading
Axon's rep basically says that their mass surveillance cameras don't see colour, just people. Then follows with the main factor is skin tone (??). A problem that was essentially noted as far back as...2019. What development in the technology is she talking about?
According to Ann-Li Cooke, Axon Enterprise’s director of responsible AI:
In response to the report, Cooke said there has been a development in the technology since 2019.
“There are gaps in both race and gender at that time,” she said. “As we did our due diligence on evaluating multiple models, we were also looking to see if there were race-based differences, and we found that in ideal conditions, that is not the case.
“Race is not the limiting factor today, the limiting factor is on skin tone. And so when there are varying conditions, such as distance [or] dim lighting, there will be different optical challenges with body-worn camera[s] — and all cameras — in detecting and matching darker-skinned individuals than lighter-skinned individuals.”
Also note that the facial-recognition technology seems to have a fatal flaw when it comes to women with darker skin.
However, Gideon Christian, an associate professor of AI and law at the University of Calgary, said the inequities attached to facial-recognition technology are too great to ignore and that he believes there is not enough recent research to suggest any significant improvement.
“Facial-recognition technology has been shown to have its worst error rate in identifying darker-skinned individuals, especially black females,” he said.
In some case studies, Christian said facial-recognition technology has shown about a 98 per cent accuracy rate in identifying white male faces, but that it also has about a 35 per cent error rate in identifying darker-skinned women.
You know what was a problem with the technology back in 2019? LLMs are coded by primarily white males, and their idea for "normal" hard codes bias into the models. These "AI" products essentially show their coders' bias by discriminating what falls outside of that normal.
For example, from "How tech's white male workforce feeds bias into AI", by Aimee Picchi:
The report highlights several ways AI programs have created harmful circumstances to groups that already suffer from bias. Among them are:
An Amazon AI hiring tool that scanned resumes from applicants relied on previous hires' resumes to set standards for ideal hires. However, the AI started downgrading applicants who attended women's colleges or who included the word "women's" in their resumes.
Amazon's Rekognition facial analysis program had difficulty identifying dark-skinned women. According to one report, the program misidentified them as men, although the program had no problem identifying men of any skin tone.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-bias-problem-techs-white-male-workforce/
Purchases by federal agencies are generally exempt from tariffs.
US Tariffs - just on the stuff normal people have to live on.
Another Asian being harassed by Westjet? This time their elderly father takes a hit in the eye?
I suppose Charlet Chung received the Westjet star treatment since they didn't strike her or any of her party.
I still miss those smaller "mini" pizzas. But I haven't had a pizza pop for years now because I always thought it was too fake to eat. I guess if there's a E.coli risk maybe there's real ingredients in there.